1990
DOI: 10.5833/jjgs.23.2196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evoluation of DNA ploidy content in early gastric cancer with recurrence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that the DNA ploidy pattern of cancer cells is associated with vessel invasion [7-9, 13, 16], lymph node involvement [7-9, 13, 17], depth of invasion [9,13], and stage [7,12], but it had no correlation with clinicopathologic findings in patients with gastric cancer and subserosal invasion [15]. The present study indicated that DNA ploidy pattern had no association with any of the conventional clinicopathologic findings associated with gastric cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been reported that the DNA ploidy pattern of cancer cells is associated with vessel invasion [7-9, 13, 16], lymph node involvement [7-9, 13, 17], depth of invasion [9,13], and stage [7,12], but it had no correlation with clinicopathologic findings in patients with gastric cancer and subserosal invasion [15]. The present study indicated that DNA ploidy pattern had no association with any of the conventional clinicopathologic findings associated with gastric cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Hedley et al reported the method for measuring nuclear DNA content in malignant tumors using paraffin-embedded blocks [1] the study of biologic characteristics of malignancy has improved [2][3][4][5][6]. For gastric cancer, some reports indicated that the patients with diploid tumors survived longer than patients with aneuploid tumors [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], whereas others reported that the DNA ploidy pattern has no relation to the length of survival [18 -20]. This discrepancy was explained as a difference in the stage of the disease of the patients examined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%