2015
DOI: 10.1118/1.4906245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of the iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm for CT simulation in radiotherapy

Abstract: IMAR correction algorithm could be readily implemented in an existing clinical workflow upon commercial release. While residual errors still exist in IMAR corrected images, these images present with better overall conspicuity of the patient/phantom geometry and offer more accurate CT numbers for improved local dosimetry. The variety of different scenarios included herein attest to the utility of the evaluated IMAR for a wide range of radiotherapy clinical scenarios.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
100
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the reconstruction, the method smears back the inconsistent projection values into the image by utilizing the back projection operation. This results in streaking artifacts reducing the image quality 3, 4, 5. Anatomical details may be superimposed by metal artifacts and are therefore not distinguishable from each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the reconstruction, the method smears back the inconsistent projection values into the image by utilizing the back projection operation. This results in streaking artifacts reducing the image quality 3, 4, 5. Anatomical details may be superimposed by metal artifacts and are therefore not distinguishable from each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image quality is potentially being reduced up to a point where a delineation of anatomical structures is no longer possible. This drastically influences the clinical examination 5, 7, 8, 9. Consequently, an accurate contouring of target structures and organs at risk is no longer guaranteed and the dose planning process is inaccurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One particular method of interest is the Augmented Likelihood Image Reconstruction (ALIR) that has proven to outperform current methods for clinically relevant data 15. In order to integrate such a method in the daily routine within a clinical environment, the method needs to be evaluated extensively 5, 7, 16, 17. Such evaluation should not only focus on retrieving missing anatomical information and improving image quality, but should also investigate the retrieval of correct HU values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations