2021
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical decision support for severe trauma patients: Machine learning based definition of a bundle of care for hemorrhagic shock and traumatic brain injury

Abstract: BACKGROUND:Deviation from guidelines is frequent in emergency situations, and this may lead to increased mortality. Probably because of time constraints, 55% is the greatest reported guidelines compliance rate in severe trauma patients. This study aimed to identify among all available recommendations a reasonable bundle of items that should be followed to optimize the outcome of hemorrhagic shocks (HSs) and severe traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). METHODS:We first estimated the compliance with French and Europe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our results, in 2019, patients that could decrease the 7-day mortality of these patients. This nding highlights the value of ML algorithms for application in critical clinical decision makings 44 .…”
Section: 46mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In line with our results, in 2019, patients that could decrease the 7-day mortality of these patients. This nding highlights the value of ML algorithms for application in critical clinical decision makings 44 .…”
Section: 46mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The race toward achieving reliable ML model for robust clinical decision-making continues 53 . For example, Lang et al provided clinical decision support for TBI patients capable of reducing the 7-day mortality showing the ML potential in clinical decision makings 54 . On the contrary, ML failed to outperform LR in predicting the outcome of a large database of patients with moderate to severe TBI 55 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eighteen studies did not provide any information on any validation performed on the model. Twelve studies utilized a secondary cohort from a different database as a testing set for the models [ 45 , 57 , 58 , 61 , 68 , 73 , 88 , 90 , 93 , 96 , 110 , 115 ]. Finally, out of the included studies, four studies performed an external validation on a previously developed ML model [ 31 , 47 , 61 , 115 ].…”
Section: Application Of ML Algorithms For Hemorrhagic Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of imputation methods, mean imputation was the most used among the 33 studies which mention how the missing values were handled. Other imputation methods used were iterative or multiple imputation, ElasticNet regression, optimal imputation, chained equation imputation, and median imputation [ 30 , 35 , 44 , 62 , 70 , 71 , 80 , 94 , 97 , 110 , 113 ]. For dealing with imbalanced data, 6 studies addressed it with the most commonly used method being Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique [ 49 , 63 , 72 , 81 , 91 , 99 ].…”
Section: Application Of ML Algorithms For Hemorrhagic Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%