1978
DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.54.638.791
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Clinical course following diabetic ocular palsy

Abstract: Summary Eleven patients who had a diabetic ocular palsy were reviewed. Clinical evidence of microangiopathy or atherosclerosis was infrequent, thus such a palsy does not presage subsequent diabetic complications nor do these observations support the suggestion that diabetic ocular palsies are caused by vascular disease.

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
11
1
0
0

Citation Types

1
6
0
0

Year Published

Range
1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
4

Relationship

0
12

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 12 publications

(7 citation statements)
references

References 5 publications

1
6
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Patients with OM recovered faster than patients with THS and ocular diabetic neuropathy, consistent with previously reported results [ 7 , 10 , 18 , 19 , 25 , 26 ]. The average recovery time of OM is approximately 3 weeks, whereas that of THS is approximately 2 months and ocular diabetic neuropathy is 3–4 months [ 7 , 9 , 10 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Pupil sparing was not only common in patients with ocular diabetic neuropathy, but was also common in patients with THS and OM. It is widely accepted that pupillary dysfunction is suggestive of aneurysmal or neoplastic compressive lesions [ 27 , 28 ], and it is not common in diabetic ophthalmoplegia [ 25 , 26 , 29 ]. Only 14–18% of patients with diabetic ophthalmoplegia develop pupillary dysfunction [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation