2020
DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.919463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Characterization of 2 Siblings with a Homozygous SPAST Variant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, there have been two reports of homozygous variants in SPAST. One, with the nonsense mutation p.(Ser545Ter), which also reports a complex and severe form of the disease, 69 and another, with the mutation p.(Leu534Pro), who showed a pure spastic paraparesis at the age of 39. 70 The patient from our cohort and the previously reported patient with p.(Ser545Ter) presented with a more severe form of the disease, probably because they carried nonsense mutations, while the latter patient had a missense mutation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, there have been two reports of homozygous variants in SPAST. One, with the nonsense mutation p.(Ser545Ter), which also reports a complex and severe form of the disease, 69 and another, with the mutation p.(Leu534Pro), who showed a pure spastic paraparesis at the age of 39. 70 The patient from our cohort and the previously reported patient with p.(Ser545Ter) presented with a more severe form of the disease, probably because they carried nonsense mutations, while the latter patient had a missense mutation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, there have been two reports of homozygous variants in SPAST . One, with the nonsense mutation p.(Ser545Ter), which also reports a complex and severe form of the disease, 26 and another, with the mutation p.(Leu534Pro), who showed a pure spastic paraparesis at the age of 39. 27 The patient from our cohort and the previously reported patient with p.(Ser545Ter) presented with a more severe form of the disease, probably because they carried nonsense mutations, while the latter patient had a missense mutation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%