1988
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700009934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review

Abstract: SynopsisVisual Analogue Scales (VAS) provide a simple technique for measuring subjective experience. They have been established as valid and reliable in a range of clinical and research applications, although there is also evidence of increased error and decreased sensitivity when used some subject groups. Decisions concerned with the choice of scoring interval, experimental design, and statistical analysis for VAS have in some instances been based on convention, assumption and convenience, highlighting the ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
1,057
1
21

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,748 publications
(1,082 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
1,057
1
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual analogue scales represent a simple technique for measuring subjective experience and have been established as being valid and reliable. 43 In DUSKS, using visual analogue scales (Appendix 1) to describe eye rubbing history, a statistically significant difference was identified between enroled subjects and a normal control population (19% wearing contact lenses), with keratoconics rubbing their eyes more frequently. However, by comparison, the closed questionnaire technique demonstrated a trend but no statistically significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual analogue scales represent a simple technique for measuring subjective experience and have been established as being valid and reliable. 43 In DUSKS, using visual analogue scales (Appendix 1) to describe eye rubbing history, a statistically significant difference was identified between enroled subjects and a normal control population (19% wearing contact lenses), with keratoconics rubbing their eyes more frequently. However, by comparison, the closed questionnaire technique demonstrated a trend but no statistically significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of single-item measures has frequently been restricted to cross-sectional comparison with standard measures (McCormack et al, 1988;Cunny and Perri, 1991). McHorney et al investigated how precisely different methods for measuring general health status discriminated between different groups of patients (McHorney et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A trained research nurse clinician, with established reliability on the instruments used, was present throughout the procedure and administered the 25-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) (Mazure et al 1986), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) (Hamilton 1959), the Beck Depression Inventory (Beck et al 1961), the 29-item Physical Symptom Checklist (Woods et al 1986) and visual analog scales (McCormack et al 1988) describing 16 different mood states.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%