Clinical Application of the Socket-Shield Concept in Multiple Anterior Teeth

Esteve-Pardo, G; Colomina, Lino Esteve

doi:10.1155/2018/9014372

Cited by 12 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 24 publications

(27 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Detailed analysis of the included studies is presented in Table as clinical and animal studies on the SST and their outcome. Of the included studies, 11 were case reports, 6 case series, 1 clinical randomized control trial, 1 technical report and 2 animal randomized control trials …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Detailed analysis of the included studies is presented in Table 1 [6][7][8][9][10][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] as clinical and animal studies on the SST and their outcome.…”

Section: Characteristics and Outcomes Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In cases with adjacent implants, the interdental papilla can be preserved by SST. It is quite helpful in maintaining pink and white esthetics in the anterior region in critical cases such as patients with a high lip line . SST is contraindicated in certain cases, like teeth with widening of the periodontal ligament (PDL), periodontal disease or mobility.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is quite helpful in maintaining pink and white esthetics in the anterior region in critical cases such as patients with a high lip line. [6][7][8] SST is contraindicated in certain cases, like teeth with widening of the periodontal ligament (PDL), periodontal disease or mobility. It is also not recommended in teeth with horizontal fractures or vertical root fractures below bone level and in teeth with internal or external resorption.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Socket‐shield technique for implant placement to stabilize the facial gingival and osseous architecture: A systematic review

Mourya

Mishra

Gaddale

et al. 2019

J of Invest & Clin Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the present study was to establish the efficacy of the socket‐shield technique (SST) for the stabilization of the facial gingival and osseous architecture. An electronic search including the Cochrane databases, EBSCOhost, Medline/PubMed and Web of Science was performed. Articles related to SST for placing dental implants were included. Articles and abstracts not written in English were excluded. The initial literature search resulted in 113 articles related to questions raised. Hand searching of the journals related to implants and cross‐referencing related to SST within the selected articles resulted in 1 more paper. Finally, 20 full texts and abstract of 1 article were included in the present systematic review: 11 case reports, 6 case series, 1 human randomized control trial (RCT), 1 technical report and 2 animal RCT. Recent modifications in SST, along with long follow‐up studies with increased sample size, provided promising results. This systematic review still recommends that SST should not be used in routine clinical practise until a higher level of evidence established. Further RCT on SST are required to establish the clinical efficacy of this technique.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics and Outcomes Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Socket‐shield technique for implant placement to stabilize the facial gingival and osseous architecture: A systematic review

Mourya

Mishra

Gaddale

et al. 2019

J of Invest & Clin Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Figure 2 reports studies on the socket‐shield technique published in chronological order. It is interesting to note that 19 of the case reports and case series () were published having only three animal experiments () as data to support the decision of performing these clinical studies. Furthermore, a case series () on this technique, conducted in three private practices between January 2006 and December 2016, reported 10‐year follow‐up data.…”

Section: Figmentioning

confidence: 99%

The (in)adequacy of translational research in dentistry

Faggion

2020

European J Oral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Translational research, as the name suggests, “translates” research findings into clinical practice to improve the health of human beings. The translational process builds on information from experiments conducted at a basic level (i.e., in vitro and/or animal studies) and progresses over experimental human studies for efficacy, efficiency, and safety to implementation. Therefore, all steps in the process should be based on studies conducted with the highest methodological quality possible in order to provide accurate and useful information. Furthermore, the systematic dissemination of new procedures/techniques should be done only when they have been proven to be effective and safe. This focus article describes examples of new techniques/procedures in dentistry that have not resulted from an adequate translational research process since the initial evidence was published. These procedures are generally characterised by lack of good evidence, particularly on their potential harms, and lack of adequate chronological order, regarding the translational research process (i.e., human research being conducted before animal research). Even so, they seem to be widely disseminated, and their promotion involves a wide range of sources, including social media. Some guidance is proposed to improve the quality of the translational research process in dentistry, as well as the level of awareness of all parties involved with the use of this research: clinicians, researchers, and patients. By improving the translational research process, optimization of the application and use of these resources, with less risk to the patients, is expected.

show abstract