1985
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1660140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Application of a Chromogenic Substrate Method for Determination of Factor VIII Activity

Abstract: SummaryA chromogenic substrate kit for the determination of factor VIII activity (COATEST® Factor VIII) has been evaluated in five different laboratories, one of them using a semi-automated procedure. This chromogenic method was compared to one-stage clotting assays for factor VIII determination in plasmas from healthy subjects, carriers of hemophilia A, severe, mild and moderate hemophilia A as well as von Willebrand’s patients. In all these cases, a high correlation between these two methods was obtained (r … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cleav age of FPA from fibrinogen has been shown to occur with thrombin concentrations about 100 times less than do release BTG from platelets [12], Whether thrombin activ ity may injure platelets prior to detectable release of BTG is not known. With regard to FVIIFC, the chromogenic peptide substrate assay employed in this study is insensi tive to activation of FVIIFC by thrombin [19], and such activation would, therefore, have escaped our detection. One could, however, have expected to detect a faster decay of FVIIFC following storage of blood with high FPA levels, but this was not the case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cleav age of FPA from fibrinogen has been shown to occur with thrombin concentrations about 100 times less than do release BTG from platelets [12], Whether thrombin activ ity may injure platelets prior to detectable release of BTG is not known. With regard to FVIIFC, the chromogenic peptide substrate assay employed in this study is insensi tive to activation of FVIIFC by thrombin [19], and such activation would, therefore, have escaped our detection. One could, however, have expected to detect a faster decay of FVIIFC following storage of blood with high FPA levels, but this was not the case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, in a recent paper on the effects of high FVIII levels on the risk of VTE recurrence, they measured FVIII using both methods and could not confirm that the chromogenic method gives more reproducible results than the clotting method, as has been reported previously. [23][24][25][26][27] Third, because FVIII levels were only measured once, it is possible that misclassification occurred due to a transient rise in FVIII as an acute reaction. In order to avoid this error, the blood samples were taken from resting subjects by an experienced technician.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at least for fVIII, this increase was not observed in a preactivation-insensitive two-stage activity assay (Table 2). 21 Similarly, fVIII antigen levels by ELISA were comparable in AT ϩ/ϩ and AT m/m mice (500Ϯ100 ng/mL for AT m/m versus 410Ϯ230 for AT ϩ/ϩ mice; meanϮSD, nϭ4 to 8, PϭNS). These results suggested a low level continuous activation of the coagulation system in AT m/m mice, consistent with the observed thrombotic phenotype.…”
Section: Hemostasis Parameters In Adult Wild-type and Mutant Micementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Plasma fibrinogen was determined by a coagulation rate assay. 20 Factor VIII plasma levels were additionally determined using the Coatest Factor VIII kit (Chromogenix, Sweden) 21 and by ELISA. 22 Plasma AT antigen levels were determined by rocket immunoelectrophoresis 23 using a polyclonal rabbit anti-human AT antibody (Dako) that cross-reacts with murine AT.…”
Section: Coagulation and Hematological Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%