Clinical and social factors associated with involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation in children and adolescents: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and narrative synthesis

Abstract

Background Disparities in involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation between population subgroups have been identified in adults, but little is known about the factors associated with involuntary hospitalisation in children or adolescents. We did a systematic review, meta-analysis, and narrative synthesis to investigate the social and clinical factors associated with involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation among children and adolescents.Methods We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies of any type up to July 22, 2020, that compared the characteristics of voluntary and involuntary psychiatric inpatients (mean age of sample ≤18 years). We synthesised results using random effects meta-analysis on unadjusted data and by narrative synthesis. Heterogeneity between studies was calculated using I². This study is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42020099892.Findings 23 studies from 11 countries were included in the systematic review and narrative synthesis, of which 19 studies (n=31 212) were included in the meta-analysis. On meta-analysis, involuntary rather than voluntary hospitalisation of minors was associated with a diagnosis of psychosis (eight studies; odds ratio 3•63, 95% CI 2•43-5•44, p<0•0001), substance misuse (five studies; 1•87, 1•05-3•30, p=0•032), or intellectual disability (four studies; 3•33, 1•33-8•34, p=0•010), as well as presenting with a perceived risk of harm to self (eight studies; 2•05, 1•15-3•64, p=0•015) or to others (five studies; 2•37, 1•39-4•03, p=0•0015). Involuntary hospitalisation was also found to be associated with being aged 12 years or older (three studies; 3•57, 1•46-8•73, p=0•0052) and being from a Black rather than a White ethnic group (three studies; 2•72, 1•88-3•95, p<0•0001). There was substantial between-study heterogeneity for most factors included in the meta-analysis (I² from 51•3% to 92•3%). Narrative synthesis found that more severe illness and poorer global functioning was associated with involuntary hospitalisation.Interpretation Over-representation of involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation in certain groups might begin in childhood, potentially establishing a cycle of inequality that continues into adulthood. Further research into the systemic factors underlying these health-care inequalities and the barriers to accessing less coercive psychiatric treatment is urgently required, with specific consideration of racial and ethnic factors.

Models of integrated care for young people experiencing medical emergencies related to mental illness: a realist systematic review

“…Most studies were in predominantly White female populations; thus, socio-demographic differences in responses to treatment modalities are not yet known. This further evidenced the White centricity within mental health research, particularly in paediatrics [ 50 ]. Given that all studies involved naturalistic hospital data, this lack of nuance may be due to ethnic disparities in access to psychiatric services [ 51 ].…”

Ethnic inequalities in involuntary admission under the Mental Health Act: an exploration of mediation effects of clinical care prior to the first admission

“…25 Another likely explanation is that the provision of appointments is dependent on perceptions of riskan unmeasured factor that is highly related to involuntary admission. 4,[26][27][28] Thus, patients perceived to be at higher risk are provided with more appointments, albeit that an increased number of appointments is not contributing to reduced odds of involuntary admission.…”

Experiences of children and young people from ethnic minorities in accessing mental health care and support: rapid scoping review

“…There is also evidence that, compared with white British children and young people, those from non-white British backgrounds are more likely to be referred to inpatient and emergency services rather than outpatient or non-emergency services, 10 or involuntarily rather than voluntarily. 11 This evidence implies that, for these groups, these mental health needs may not be being met through usual health service routes. This has potential cost implications for the individuals, their families and wider communities, and for public services if there is greater use of 'crisis' services or involvement of criminal justice.…”