2015
DOI: 10.1136/jramc-2015-000439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and microbiological evaluation of epidural and regional anaesthesia catheters in injured UK military personnel

Abstract: With the exception of the epidural (34%) and proximal sciatic (42%) catheters, these figures, in a military cohort characterised by significant injury scores, are consistent with those reported for civilian surgical patients. The results strongly support the expansion of regional analgesia during Op HERRICK from 2008 onwards. The outcomes suggest a possible translation into civilian major trauma practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite CPNB and EA catheters being sited and used for a longer duration, which are conventionally used in the preoperative setting (1–5 days), detailed surveillance of all patients admitted with or receiving de novo CPNB or EA demonstrated no increased incidence of infection 43. All complex patients with trauma in Birmingham were managed using a ‘Reverse WHO’ philosophy.…”
Section: The Uk Experience From Operation Herrick In Afghanistanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite CPNB and EA catheters being sited and used for a longer duration, which are conventionally used in the preoperative setting (1–5 days), detailed surveillance of all patients admitted with or receiving de novo CPNB or EA demonstrated no increased incidence of infection 43. All complex patients with trauma in Birmingham were managed using a ‘Reverse WHO’ philosophy.…”
Section: The Uk Experience From Operation Herrick In Afghanistanmentioning
confidence: 99%