2019
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climatic niche limits and community‐level vulnerability of obligate symbioses

Abstract: Aim Communities with many species at their climatic niche limits may be vulnerable to species losses, suggesting that niche‐based measures can inform vulnerability assessments. We aimed to quantify spatial variation in community‐level vulnerability indices based on niche limits, not just central tendencies, to predict where climate changes will produce rapid, pronounced shifts in ecological communities. Location North America. Taxon Epiphytic lichenized fungi. Methods We integrated broad‐extent herbarium data … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Communities with many species at their environmental niche limits may be particularly vulnerable to local extinctions (Watson et al 2013; Smith et al 2020b). Thus, we evaluated the relative vulnerability of soil fungal functional groups by estimating the percentage of species occurring at their upper niche limits to three major global change drivers – land use (land cover change), heat (maximum monthly temperature), and drought (lowest quarterly precipitation).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Communities with many species at their environmental niche limits may be particularly vulnerable to local extinctions (Watson et al 2013; Smith et al 2020b). Thus, we evaluated the relative vulnerability of soil fungal functional groups by estimating the percentage of species occurring at their upper niche limits to three major global change drivers – land use (land cover change), heat (maximum monthly temperature), and drought (lowest quarterly precipitation).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vulnerability of soil fungal groups was estimated relative to three global change drivers – heat (maximum monthly temperature), drought (negative of inverse hyperbolic sine-transformed precipitation in the driest quarter), and land cover change – for the year 2070 (relative to 2015 baseline) using the community-mean percentile vulnerability index (V 2 ; Smith et al 2020b). This index is based on averaging percentiles of all species at a given global change driver value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are in accordance with previous studies indicating the relatively high richness of lichenised fungi in Europe and Africa, but relatively low richness in South America (Will‐Wolf et al ., 2004; Bowker et al ., 2016; Rodriguez‐Caballero et al ., 2018). Disjunct global distribution patterns of lichenised soil fungi are likely to be related to distinct climatic characteristics across continents (Will‐Wolf et al ., 2004; Tedersoo et al ., 2014; Alatalo et al ., 2017; Smith et al ., 2020). For example, Africa had relatively high annual mean temperature and aridity (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the increased temperature has also been highlighted as a major damaging factor for epiphytic lichen vitality. Smith and collaborators [ 55 ] found that warm climate tolerant lichen communities are already close to exceeding their upper climatic limits and are even more vulnerable to increased temperatures than high-elevation lichens. Our experimental design, which accounted for exposing wet lichens to direct solar radiation, does not allow us to discriminate between the effect of increased radiation and temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%