2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cleaning spectroscopic samples of stars in nearby dwarf galaxies

Abstract: Dwarf galaxies provide insight into the processes of star formation and chemical enrichment at the low end of the galaxy mass function, as well as into the clustering of dark matter on small scales. In studies of Local Group dwarf galaxies, spectroscopic samples of individual stars are used to derive the internal kinematics and abundance properties of these galaxies. It is therefore important to clean these samples from Milky Way stars, which are not related to the dwarf galaxy, since they can contaminate anal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(62 reference statements)
6
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Battaglia et al (2008a) we use a systemic velocity v hel,sys = 110.6 km s −1 and a velocity dispersion σ = 10.1 km s −1 . Due to the high latitude and distinct radial velocity of Sculptor from the Milky Way disk, the chance to accidentally select interlopers with this radial velocity criterion is very small (Battaglia & Starkenburg 2012). Figure 1 shows the equivalent widths and absolute magnitude of the selected targets along with the calibration of Starkenburg et al (2010) which deviates from earlier linear calibrations for very metal-poor stars.…”
Section: Target Selectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Following Battaglia et al (2008a) we use a systemic velocity v hel,sys = 110.6 km s −1 and a velocity dispersion σ = 10.1 km s −1 . Due to the high latitude and distinct radial velocity of Sculptor from the Milky Way disk, the chance to accidentally select interlopers with this radial velocity criterion is very small (Battaglia & Starkenburg 2012). Figure 1 shows the equivalent widths and absolute magnitude of the selected targets along with the calibration of Starkenburg et al (2010) which deviates from earlier linear calibrations for very metal-poor stars.…”
Section: Target Selectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, they are very probably foreground stars (We checked that mem0598 does not seem to be a CH star). On the other hand, mem0598 (the only star for which we have spectra in the CaT region) is not considered as dwarf foreground contaminant according to the λ = 8806.8 Å MgI line criterion (Battaglia & Starkenburg 2012).…”
Section: Agesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, our sample appears slightly biased as it misses (in relative numbers) RGB stars between -2.0 and -1.0 dex. The CaT sample might also incorporate some foreground stars that match the velocity range for Fornax membership, but their number should be quite low: combining the Mg I line at λ = 8806.8 Å and the CaT, Battaglia & Starkenburg (2012) can remove the MW dwarf stars contaminating the samples of RGB kinematic members in the dSphs. They estimate the level of contamination to be 5%.…”
Section: The Metallicity Distribution Function Of Fornaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We add this requirement since we are not confident that outside this radius a reliable velocity dispersion can be measured due to the low number density of (probable) Sculptor members compared to Milky Way stars. An improved method for discriminating Milky Way contaminants based on surface gravity in the data set of B08 has been developed by (Battaglia & Starkenburg 2012), see also .…”
Section: Velocity Dispersion Profilementioning
confidence: 99%