2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.06.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Slovak white wines using artificial neural networks and discriminant techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From the 19 variables studied, the statistical method Stepwise Linear Discriminant Analysis (SLDA) selected 10 variables and gave a global percentage of correct classification of 98.8 and 97.3% of correct prediction; the ANN method, however, selected seven variables which gave a correct classification for training and a prediction of 100%. The multilayer perceptron technique was applied to classify 36 Slovak wine samples of three varieties, produced by four producers in three different years with respect to the following variables: variety, producer/location and the year of production [26]. Over the samples considered, a prediction performance of at least 93.3% was obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 19 variables studied, the statistical method Stepwise Linear Discriminant Analysis (SLDA) selected 10 variables and gave a global percentage of correct classification of 98.8 and 97.3% of correct prediction; the ANN method, however, selected seven variables which gave a correct classification for training and a prediction of 100%. The multilayer perceptron technique was applied to classify 36 Slovak wine samples of three varieties, produced by four producers in three different years with respect to the following variables: variety, producer/location and the year of production [26]. Over the samples considered, a prediction performance of at least 93.3% was obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, wine is often classified according to polyphenolic compounds, volatile compounds, minerals, and trace elements using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Beltran et al 2006), gas chromatographymass spectroscopy (GC-MS) (Kruzlicova et al 2009), electronic nose (Aleixandre et al 2008), atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) (Galgano et al 2008) and etc. These techniques are precise enough to guarantee the authenticity of wine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative methods to analyse sensory attributes are therefore desirable. Aroma is one important characteristic of wine and there have been several recent attempts to analyse aroma characteristics of wine by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) and chemometric analysis (Canuti et al, 2009;Cozzolino et al, 2008;Kruzlicova et al, 2009;Louw et al, 2009;Masson & Schneider, 2009). GCMS is well suited to volatile analysis and can give insight into aroma characteristics of wine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%