2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2018.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification de l’OMS 2017 des tumeurs de la tête et du cou : principales nouveautés et mise à jour des méthodes diagnostiques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This presence of the different classification systems, together with the inherent subjectivity of some histological parameters, caused great inter-examiner variability and a lack of standardization in the diagnosis of epithelial dysplasia [ 26 ], which, in our opinion, should be corrected. In this sense, the search for altered morphological patterns that can be detected by mechanized and standardized reproducible methods, other than the human eye, could be of great help in diagnosis [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Many studies have been carried out, trying to find quantifiable signs that could help us to evaluate the malignant capacity of OLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This presence of the different classification systems, together with the inherent subjectivity of some histological parameters, caused great inter-examiner variability and a lack of standardization in the diagnosis of epithelial dysplasia [ 26 ], which, in our opinion, should be corrected. In this sense, the search for altered morphological patterns that can be detected by mechanized and standardized reproducible methods, other than the human eye, could be of great help in diagnosis [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Many studies have been carried out, trying to find quantifiable signs that could help us to evaluate the malignant capacity of OLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, there are different subtypes of SGT with different molecular and prognostic implications. 3 Additionally, SGT encompass a heterogeneous group of diseases arising from different locations including major salivary glands (parotid, submandibular, and sublingual) and minor salivary glands. 4 Overall, the prognosis of patients with recurrent inoperable or metastatic SGT remains limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ВОЗ относит к потенциально злокачественным расстройствам полости рта: лейкоплакию, эритроплакию, эритролейкоплакию, оральный субмукозный фиброз, врождённый дискератоз, кератоз от бездымного табака, поражения нёба при реверсном курении (зажжённый конец сигареты в полости рта), хронический кандидоз, красный плоский лишай, дискоидную красную волчанку, сифилитический глоссит, актинический кератоз (только губ) [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified