2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mser.2013.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical atomistic simulations of surfaces and heterogeneous interfaces with the charge-optimized many body (COMB) potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
201
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
1
201
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Wei et al [22] benchmarked various potentials for graphene against density--functional theory (DFT) data and found that the ReaxFF potential performed poorly. By contrast, the REBO2 potential performed quite well and the third generation of the COMB potential (COMB3) [9,10] uses the REBO2 C--C interaction at shorter distances. Also, a parameterisation of the COMB3 formalism has already been successfully used to study hydrocarbons on Cu surfaces [9] as well as surface oxidation of Cu [23].…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Wei et al [22] benchmarked various potentials for graphene against density--functional theory (DFT) data and found that the ReaxFF potential performed poorly. By contrast, the REBO2 potential performed quite well and the third generation of the COMB potential (COMB3) [9,10] uses the REBO2 C--C interaction at shorter distances. Also, a parameterisation of the COMB3 formalism has already been successfully used to study hydrocarbons on Cu surfaces [9] as well as surface oxidation of Cu [23].…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The empirical potentials required to model graphene on Cu must meet some rather tough requirements. In section 2 of this paper we will explain our choice of the charge optimised many--body potential (COMB) [9,10] and provide details of how simulations were carried out. In section 3.1 we first present and discuss results of how the COMB potential describes various properties of the graphene/Cu system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are specialised methods for accelerating AIMD, but each has its own issues and subtleties (Voter 1997a(Voter , b, 1998Sørensen and Voter 2000;Laio and Parrinello 2002). The RMD methods employ reactive interatomic potentials (Abell 1985;Tersoff 1988;Brenner 1990;Stuart et al 2000;van Duin et al 2001;Brenner et al 2002;Su and Goddard 2007;Shan et al 2010;Knippenberg et al 2012;Liang et al 2013), or are based on the use of switching functions (Nyden et al 1992). Both approaches have been used for studying the thermal decomposition of polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details of the COMB3 potential and the parameters for the Ti-C system can be found elsewhere. [19,21] bonding environment changes. [19] M A N U S C R I P T…”
Section: Classical Molecular Dynamics Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%