2003
DOI: 10.1093/jrs/16.1.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citizens and Denizens: Ethnicity, Homelands, and the Crisis of Displacement in Northeast India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While the Northeast has been the site of separatist claims and slow integration into the Indian union, Ladakh has been the site of an identity-based struggle for separation from the state of Jammu and Kashmir (Aggarwal, 2004;Aggarwal and Bhan, 2009;Van Beek, 2000). In both cases state-based and local political struggles have begun from the idea of 'ethnically exclusive homelands', which has shaped political activism and subjectivities (Baruah, 2003;Van Beek, 2000). As borderlands of India, these regions have been seen as central to nation-building (Aggarwal and Bhan, 2009;Cons and Sanyal, 2013) or as not quite of the nation (Gellner, 2013) and have also been fraught with internal conflict (Baruah, 2005;Bhaumik, 2009).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Northeast has been the site of separatist claims and slow integration into the Indian union, Ladakh has been the site of an identity-based struggle for separation from the state of Jammu and Kashmir (Aggarwal, 2004;Aggarwal and Bhan, 2009;Van Beek, 2000). In both cases state-based and local political struggles have begun from the idea of 'ethnically exclusive homelands', which has shaped political activism and subjectivities (Baruah, 2003;Van Beek, 2000). As borderlands of India, these regions have been seen as central to nation-building (Aggarwal and Bhan, 2009;Cons and Sanyal, 2013) or as not quite of the nation (Gellner, 2013) and have also been fraught with internal conflict (Baruah, 2005;Bhaumik, 2009).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often argued that the lack of development is directly related to the rise in 'tribal unrest' and ethnic conflicts in India (Planning Commission of India, 1997;World Bank, 2007). The academic literature on development in Tripura is specifically limited to its analysis on the relationship between conflicts, 'tribal insurgencies' and underdevelopment, and very few studies have examined other dimensions of development which include gender and migration issues, power relations within and between tribal groups and class formation in the North-east (Agarwal, 1994;Baruah, 1999;Nongbri, 2003).…”
Section: State-initiated Development In Tripura and The North-eastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These struggles were a response to forced integration into the Indian Union, uneven local political and economic autonomy and the neglect of basic needs. In response, the Indian government has created new states and territorial units normalizing the notion of 'ethnically exclusive homelands' (Baruah 2003). Furthermore, the inability of successive Indian governments and local governments to control migration into the region has furthered grievances and violence.…”
Section: Figure 51 Indian States and Territoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%