Citation classics in clinical dermatologic journals. Citation analysis, biomedical journals, and landmark articles, 1945-1990

The Scientific Articles on Art Criticism

“…None of the articles were review articles in the 11 top cited journals, whereas all of which contained the genuine articles. Results are in distinction with common assumption that the review articles have the topmost citation number (Ale Dubin, Hafner, & Arndt, 1993). The findings of this study are coherent with former research on the topmost cited articles in different field (Baltussen & Kindler, 2004).…”

The top 101 cited articles in environmental clean-up: Oil spill remediation

“…In the current study, the journals were obtained from various fields, and the majority of which were from the field of Environmental Science followed by Although we were expecting a higher number, only 2% of the papers were review articles, whereas majority included original research articles (88%). These results are in contrast with the general belief that review articles had the highest number of citations (Dubin et al, 1993). Our findings are consistent with those of previous studies on top cited articles in other fields (Baltussen and Christoph, 2004;Hennessey et al, 2009).…”

Disclosure of Information in Company’s Annual Reports: A Bibliometric Analysis

“…With respect to this results, this study also recognised that most of the papers that received the highest citation were journal papers. This was consistent to studies conducted by Baltussen, and Kindler (2004), and Dubin, Häfner, and Arndt (1993) who claimed that the publication of the articles in journal (i.e., reviewed papers) would have higher tendency to be cited and receive higher number of citations. Furthermore, it can also be noticed that the highest cited paper in this area logically depended on its publication year.…”