1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(1997)20:1<77::aid-lsm12>3.0.co;2-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circumferential measurement of anulus deviation after laser nucleotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…82,97 The volume removed (478.5 ± 129.4 mm 3 ) and disc height loss (0.74 ± 0.3 mm) seen in the rongeurs group in this study were toward the higher end of the values reported by Zengerle et al 32 (150-300 mm 3 and 0.3-0.7 mm) although their measurements were made with 100 N of compression on the specimen, rather than the 50 N used here. The range of the disc height reduction seen in the post-laser group in this study, 0.2 ± 0.1 mm was similar to that reported by Kutschera et al 98 in the unloaded state (0.1-0.32 mm).…”
Section: Stiffnesssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…82,97 The volume removed (478.5 ± 129.4 mm 3 ) and disc height loss (0.74 ± 0.3 mm) seen in the rongeurs group in this study were toward the higher end of the values reported by Zengerle et al 32 (150-300 mm 3 and 0.3-0.7 mm) although their measurements were made with 100 N of compression on the specimen, rather than the 50 N used here. The range of the disc height reduction seen in the post-laser group in this study, 0.2 ± 0.1 mm was similar to that reported by Kutschera et al 98 in the unloaded state (0.1-0.32 mm).…”
Section: Stiffnesssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…After searching the medical literature and applying the inclusion criteria only 12 articles were located prior to the review. 2,4,6,7,9–16 The subsequent 12‐month literature search failed to locate any additional papers. None of the papers offered high‐quality evidence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence obtained from comparative studies with historical control, two or more single-arm studies or interrupted time series without a parallel control group IV Evidence obtained from case series, either post-test or pre-test and post-test prior to the review. 2,4,6,7,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The subsequent 12-month literature search failed to locate any additional papers. None of the papers offered high-quality evidence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations