2020
DOI: 10.3233/jad-190713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulating Vitamin D Levels and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study in the IGAP and UK Biobank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In MR analyses using the International Genomic of Alzheimer's Project (IGAP) dataset, risk of AD was found to be lower for individuals with genetic variants predicting higher levels of serum 25(OH)D compared to those without these variants [115]. In the most recent analysis using six such alleles (21,982 cases of Alzheimer's disease and 41,944 controls), the relative risk per allele was 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.46 to 0.84) [115]. Together with the data based on serum levels of 25(OH)D, these findings provide substantial evidence that adequate vitamin D will reduce risk of dementia.…”
Section: Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia And Cognitive Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MR analyses using the International Genomic of Alzheimer's Project (IGAP) dataset, risk of AD was found to be lower for individuals with genetic variants predicting higher levels of serum 25(OH)D compared to those without these variants [115]. In the most recent analysis using six such alleles (21,982 cases of Alzheimer's disease and 41,944 controls), the relative risk per allele was 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.46 to 0.84) [115]. Together with the data based on serum levels of 25(OH)D, these findings provide substantial evidence that adequate vitamin D will reduce risk of dementia.…”
Section: Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia And Cognitive Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the summary results of these 14 genetic variants in both serum calcium levels and IS GWAS datasets, we first conducted a pleiotropy analysis using two statistical methods including the MR-Egger intercept test and the MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) test (Verbanck et al, 2018). Both methods have been widely used in recent MR studies (Liu et al, 2018;Larsson et al, 2019;He et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020). The statistical significance for evidence of pleiotropy is P < 0.05.…”
Section: Pleiotropy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, a flow chart about our MR study design. The second and third assumptions are collectively known as independence from pleiotropy, as described in recent studies [16][17][18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%