2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-1282-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ciprofloxacin resistance in community- and hospital-acquired Escherichia coli urinary tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Abstract: BackgroundDuring the last decade the resistance rate of urinary Escherichia coli (E. coli) to fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin has increased. Systematic reviews of studies investigating ciprofloxacin resistance in community- and hospital-acquired E. coli urinary tract infections (UTI) are absent. This study systematically reviewed the literature and where appropriate, meta-analysed studies investigating ciprofloxacin resistance in community- and hospital-acquired E. coli UTIs.MethodsObservational studies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
116
1
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
10
116
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The predominant multidrug resistance phenotype was AMP, AMX, KAN, TET, NAL, CIP, TMP-SMX (19.5 % of UPEC isolates), followed by AMP, AMX, TET, NAL, CIP, TMP-SMX (14.6 % of UPEC isolates). The high incidence of resistance in UPEC isolates to TMP-SMX (100 %) and CIP (100 %) agrees with the findings of previous studies reporting an increasing trend in resistance to CIP in UPEC [35,36]. Thus, resistance to fluoroquinolone in all UPEC isolates is alarming, as this agent is one of the few available therapies for serious E. coli infections.…”
Section: Resistance Phenotypessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The predominant multidrug resistance phenotype was AMP, AMX, KAN, TET, NAL, CIP, TMP-SMX (19.5 % of UPEC isolates), followed by AMP, AMX, TET, NAL, CIP, TMP-SMX (14.6 % of UPEC isolates). The high incidence of resistance in UPEC isolates to TMP-SMX (100 %) and CIP (100 %) agrees with the findings of previous studies reporting an increasing trend in resistance to CIP in UPEC [35,36]. Thus, resistance to fluoroquinolone in all UPEC isolates is alarming, as this agent is one of the few available therapies for serious E. coli infections.…”
Section: Resistance Phenotypessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In our study however, overall resistance rates to these drugs were 48.4% and 38.1%, respectively. There are more studies demonstrating high resistance rates to both agents [23,28,[31][32][33][34], which together with our findings, question the position of trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin as first-line therapy for UTIs. Furthermore, neither gentamicin nor cephalosporins -including cefepime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, and cephalexin -could be used as empiric therapy in Serbia [5,16,26] due to high resistance rates observed in this study: 29.7% for gentamicin, and 20.2%, 26.5%, 29.8%, and 31.7% for the cephalosporins respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Fato este que demonstra a importância em se repensar o uso empírico de ciprofloxacina em infecções urinárias hospitalares, em especial nas UTI's. 5 Semelhantemente à literatura, este estudo mostrou que nas infecções urinárias por Escherichia coli o sexo feminino é o predominante. 18,19 Conforme observado nesta análise, o fator sondagem vesical como determinante para aumento das infecções é corroborado pela maior prevalência de Escherichia coli resistente à ciprofloxacina junto às clínicas, com destaque para a clínica médica e neurocirurgia.…”
Section: R Epidemiol Control Infec Santa Cruz Do Sulunclassified