2017
DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232017223.18992016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ciência & Saúde Coletiva: análise da produção científica e redes colaborativas de pesquisa

Abstract: The purpose of this metric and descriptive study was to identify the most productive authors and their collaborative research networks from articles published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva between, 2005, and 2014

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the number of authors who signed the publications analyzed in this study, group research predominated at the expense of individual research. Other authors point out converging facts and indicate that this is a characteristic of studies in the field of health sciences [43][44][45] . Group research is an expectation in funded research, given that partnerships can enhance the combination of complementary skills and knowledge 46 , in addition to multidisciplinary speeches 47 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Regarding the number of authors who signed the publications analyzed in this study, group research predominated at the expense of individual research. Other authors point out converging facts and indicate that this is a characteristic of studies in the field of health sciences [43][44][45] . Group research is an expectation in funded research, given that partnerships can enhance the combination of complementary skills and knowledge 46 , in addition to multidisciplinary speeches 47 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The 278 scientific publications identified in the primary search were therefore loaded into the software where it then generated 568 networks of the 40 most cited publications, particularly those cited at least 10 times in the set studied, according to the usual standards (Conner et al , 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• UR Fonte: Dados da pesquisa (2019). [11,12] RU RP UD [13] Os trabalhos analisados permitem identi car sobre os per s dos pesquisadores e estudos sobre educação superior em saúde, uma vez que denotam a escassez do nanciamento, através do grande número de artigos originais que não informam, ou não possuem, nanciamento. deste trabalho, apenas 30% dos artigos se relaciona aos temas propostos.…”
Section: Dgur S Vshfwrv Gd Dq Olvh Eleolrp Wulfdunclassified