Abstract:ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of chlorhexidine 0.12% mouthwash (CHX) after tooth extraction for the prevention of alveolar osteitis (AO).Material and methodsWe conducted a double-blind randomised clinical trial stratified by risk factors. We enrolled a cohort of 822 patients who underwent dental extractions, and were considered to be at risk of developing AO (previous surgical site infection, traumatic extraction, and tobacco smoking). After extraction, patients were randomly allocated for CHX group … Show more
“…All patients receiving treatment rinsed for 30 seconds with 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) and 30 seconds with 1.5% hydrogen peroxide solution. Preoperative rinses with CHX demonstrate a significant reduction in colony forming units and postoperative infections 35‐37 . Other literature indicates that SARS‐CoV‐2 may be more vulnerable to oxidative destruction 22,38 .…”
During the COVID-19 pandemic, incidence rates for dental diseases will continue unabated. However, the intent to prevent the spread of this lethal respiratory disease will likely lead to reduced treatment access due to restrictions on population movements. These changes have the potential to increase dental-related emergency department visits and subsequently contribute to greater viral transmission. Moreover, dentists experience unique challenges with preventing transmission due to frequent aerosol-producing procedures. This paper presents reviews and protocols implemented by directors and residents at the Dental College of Georgia to manage a dental emergency clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic. The methods presented include committee-based prioritization of dental patients, a multilayered screening process, team rotations with social and temporal spacing, and modified treatment room protocols. These efforts aid in the reduction of viral transmission, conservation of personal protective equipment, and expand provider availability. These protocols transcend a university and hospital-based models and are applicable to private and corporate models.
“…All patients receiving treatment rinsed for 30 seconds with 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) and 30 seconds with 1.5% hydrogen peroxide solution. Preoperative rinses with CHX demonstrate a significant reduction in colony forming units and postoperative infections 35‐37 . Other literature indicates that SARS‐CoV‐2 may be more vulnerable to oxidative destruction 22,38 .…”
During the COVID-19 pandemic, incidence rates for dental diseases will continue unabated. However, the intent to prevent the spread of this lethal respiratory disease will likely lead to reduced treatment access due to restrictions on population movements. These changes have the potential to increase dental-related emergency department visits and subsequently contribute to greater viral transmission. Moreover, dentists experience unique challenges with preventing transmission due to frequent aerosol-producing procedures. This paper presents reviews and protocols implemented by directors and residents at the Dental College of Georgia to manage a dental emergency clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic. The methods presented include committee-based prioritization of dental patients, a multilayered screening process, team rotations with social and temporal spacing, and modified treatment room protocols. These efforts aid in the reduction of viral transmission, conservation of personal protective equipment, and expand provider availability. These protocols transcend a university and hospital-based models and are applicable to private and corporate models.
“…Clinical data was collected with regard to AO formation on the 3rd and 7th days after surgery. Symptoms of this postoperative complication were evaluated with the following characteristics: (1) postoperative pain with increasing severity 2 to 3 days in, and around the extraction site; (2) partial or total loss of blood clot and exposure of the alveolar bone with or without halitosis [30,31]. Other defining symptoms such as radiating pain towards the temporal region and ear, inflamed gingival margin, ipsilateral regional lymphadenopathy and, less commonly, low-grade fever, were also noted [13,31,32].…”
Section: Cgf Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample size was calculated with PASS 2000 software [33]. An incidence of 10% in the CGF group and 30% in the control group was estimated to detect a difference (P0 -P1) with the binomial hypothesis test [31,34]. This showed that 57 subjects would be sufficient to obtain 96% power in detecting a statistical difference between the test and control groups, with a target significance level of 0.05.…”
Background: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effectiveness of concentrated growth factors (CGF) in preventing the development of alveolar osteitis (AO) after the extraction of partially-erupted mandibular third molars. Methods: Seventy patients (26 men and 44 women) 18 years or older (mean age 25.86; range 18-35) underwent 140 third molar extractions. All the patients presented with bilateral, partially-erupted mandibular third molars and underwent surgical extractions. In each case, one socket received CGF and the other served as a control. The predictor variable was the CGF application and the sides were categorized as 'CGF' and 'non-CGF'. The outcome variable was the development of AO during the first postoperative week. Other study variables included age and gender. Data were analyzed using Cochran's Q test with the significance level set at a P value less than 0.05. Results: The overall frequency of AO was 11.4% for the control group. The frequency of AO in the CGF group was significantly lower than in the non-CGF group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, application of CGF fibrin gel may decrease the risk of AO development after mandibular third molar surgery. Trial registration: This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov database on November 1, 2019 (ID: NCT04151147, retrospectively registered).
“…Several measures are used to reduce the incidence of AO including warm saline mouth rinse, the use of prophylactic antibiotics, chlorhexidine mouthwash, and platelet-rich fibrin (Eshghpour, Dastmalchi, Nekooei, & Nejat, 2014;Osunde, 2015;Xue et al, 2015;Halabi, Escobar, Alvarado, Martinez, & Muñoz, 2018;Unsal & Erbasar, 2018). However, Xue and co-authors confirmed that Prophylactic amoxicillin (or clindamycin) is not effective for the prevention or reduction of postoperative inflammatory complications after the removal of impacted mandibular third molars in the Chinese population (Xue et al, 2015).…”
Section: Experimental Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Tek and co-workers found that Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS) can be used safely for haemostasis following an impacted mandibular third molar surgery without potentially increasing the risk of AO formation (Tek et al, 2014). Very recently, Halabi and others, verified that 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash is safe and effective in reducing the incidence of AO in high-risk patients (Halabi et al, 2018). Unsal and colleagues as well as Eshghpour and co-workers verified in their experimental clinical trials that platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) significantly reduced the AO incidence, especially following mandibular third molar surgery, among smokers, and it also had a positive effect on postoperative pain levels although it did not affect periodontal healing (Eshghpour & Dastmalchi, 2014;Unsal & Erbasar, 2018).…”
Introduction: Alveolar osteitis is a painful condition that may occur following permanent teeth extraction due to the failure of formation of a blood clot or its dislodgement before the complete healing of the wound. We aim to provide a systematic review and trends analytic on the epidemiology and the digital epidemiology as well as the management of alveolar osteitis and to seek any available data in connection with alveolar osteitis following upper premolar tooth extraction. Methods: This study represents a combinatory of literature review, analytics of Google Trends, and the first documented case from Iraq of alveolar osteitis following extraction of the maxillary first premolar. Three literature databases were explored, using Boolean operators, including NCBI-PubMed, Elsevier, and the Cochrane Library. Google Trends database was examined to assess the digital epidemiology. Results:The total number of hits was 54417. There was an overall deficit of literature concerning the condition in connection with the extraction of maxillary premolars. The digital epidemiology was limited to twenty-two countries including three countries from the Middle East accounting for 13.63% of the total geographic mapping while Iraq was absent. Conclusion:Our exceptional case report instigated a systematic analytic of a trends database and the literature. The analysis confirmed the inadequacy of studies from the Middle East. Future studies should deploy the use of machine learning algorithms for a rigour statistical inference based on data from online and offline big data repositories of public health records.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.