2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01628-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlamydia pneumoniae exposure and inflammatory markers in acute coronary syndrome (CIMACS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is not simply the sample exposure to C. pneumoniae, but the way in which the infection is handled by the individual immune system (host-pathogen interaction) that affects CHD [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is not simply the sample exposure to C. pneumoniae, but the way in which the infection is handled by the individual immune system (host-pathogen interaction) that affects CHD [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the present work was to investigate whether chronic chlamydial infection is correlated to CHD. Furthermore, as systemic inflammation is a link between infection and the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [12][13][14], we examined the role of C. pneumoniae and of inflammatory markers in the pathogenesis of coronary disease, correlated to the production of IL-7, which may be involved in the inflammatory processes observed in atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Helsinki Heart Study (24), these authors demonstrated that chronic C. pneumoniae infectionwhich they defined by the presence of an elevated IgA titer and LPS containing immune complexes-was an independent risk factor for the development of CHD 3 to 6 months before the coronary event. Since these initial reports, many studies have confirmed an association between antibodies to C. pneumoniae and coronary artery disease, but negative findings have also been frequently reported (2,4,12,13,18,19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provision of direct proof of persistent C. pneumoniae infection by PCR is still not routine (4,7,31,45); therefore, serological analysis represents the current routine method for the diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection. However, findings reported on the basis of seroepidemiology have been controversial (11,12,42). The diagnostic method used must be accurate for a study to be valid, and the different accuracies of the diagnostic methods used might explain the opposing findings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%