This paper reports the results of a survey of 101 Japanese university students' perceptions of different varieties of English using an open-ended questionnaire. Participants indicated their first impressions of varieties of English that they had named. This methodology allows participants themselves to provide the specific varieties as well as the evaluative categories and avoids problems associated with using voice stimuli while capturing the stereotypes of the countries they name, a method of research well-established in perceptual dialectology. There were consistent patterns of evaluation of Englishes not found in similar research such as characterisations of US English as authentic, the default variety, a familiar or easy variety. Typically, when evaluating varieties of English, respondents attribute higher status to UK English than US English. Capturing the attitudes of non-native speakers to varieties of English provides understanding of the influences on the shape of English as a global language as attitudes are known to be a powerful influence on the usage and perceptions of language varieties. among the UK respondents they surveyed. Thus, an interesting question remains about the discrepancy between the evaluation of varieties in question by native speakers in previous research and the evaluation by non-native speakers found by McKenzie, particularly perhaps since McKenzie did not include the stereotypically status-preferred RP variety.McKenzie (2008c) also found that these same Japanese learners of English were relatively good at correctly identifying the US varieties as originating from the US but not the country of origin of the other varieties. For example, 59% of the respondents identified Southern US English and 54% correctly identified the Midwest US English as American. Only 32% identified Glaswegian standard and 31% Glaswegian vernacular as originating from the UK. McKenzie (2008b) calls for more research on attitudes to varieties of English to better understand these attitudes and inform language planning policy and language pedagogy.It seems that how non-native speakers perceive different varieties of Inner Circle Englishes remains unclear. As such, we feel that research on those varieties is merited; however, we do not intend, by conducting such research, to suggest that Inner Circle varieties are more important than Outer and Expanding circle varieties or to reinforce the hegemonic position of Inner Circle varieties. We believe that perceptions and attitudes to different varieties of English are crucial towards understanding the use and form of global English. So, while some scholars believe 'A socially realistic approach to language has to recognise that variation exists within a national variety, whether American, Australian, or British -and the same is true of Englishes in the Outer and Expanding Circles' (Kachru & Smith, 2009, p. 6), research on attitudes towards those varieties and the power those