2013
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Chinese herbal medicine for atopic eczema
Abstract: h 2009, 'Chinese herbal medicine for atopic eczema', Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 8, pp. 1-29.Note: Attached version is more recent than the RMIT Research Repository Record as the Publisher Policy states the most recent version needs to be included into the repository.
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
125
16
10
2
Citation Types
1
74
0
1
Year Published
Range
2006
20062026
2026Publication Types
Select...
133
7
4
4
Relationship
3
145
Authors
Journals
Cited by 148 publications
(76 citation statements)
References 56 publications
1
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 54%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 54%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…After deduplication, 635 records were screened; 127 records underwent full-text screening and 38 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria (figure 1). 7 8 23–56 The list of excluded reviews is in online supplemental appendix 2. The search of PROSPERO identified five ongoing systematic reviews (online supplemental appendix 3).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of two RCTs99 100 was presented in two systematic reviews 39 40. More cutaneous adverse events, including application site burning, were observed with 2 weeks of very potent/potent TCS compared with topical Chinese herbal medicine (RR 12.03, 95% CI 1.59 to 91.26, p=0.02; 11/147 vs 0/148 participants).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Effectiveness and Safety of Herbal Medicine for Atopic Dermatitis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Four reviews [ 7 , 22 , 25 , 27 ] were published in English, and the remaining five [ 21 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 28 ] were published in Chinese. There was a Cochrane review [ 22 ] comparing the efficacy and safety of oral and/or external HM with placebo, no treatment, or active controls. Among the remaining SRs, one [ 21 ] compared oral HM with oral antihistamines; one [ 7 ] compared oral HM with placebo, no treatment, or active controls; one [ 23 ] compared oral HM alone or in combination with CM with CM alone; one [ 24 ] compared oral or external HM in combination with CM with CM alone; one [ 25 ] compared EATM treatments including oral HM, acupuncture, and moxibustion with placebo or CM; one [ 26 ] compared oral Jinpi (meaning tonifying spleen) HM alone or in combination with CM with CM alone; one [ 27 ] compared Tripterygium agents alone or in combination with CM with CM alone; one [ 28 ] compared oral or external HM with CM or placebo.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the AMSTAR-2 checklist, all reviews specified the research question and inclusion criteria including the components of PICO and explained the selection of the study designs for inclusion. However, only two reviews [ 22 , 27 ] preregistered the study protocol. The authors of most SRs [ 21 – 23 , 25 , 27 , 28 ] independently performed the study selection and data extraction.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 54%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…After deduplication, 635 records were screened; 127 records underwent full-text screening and 38 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria (figure 1). 7 8 23–56 The list of excluded reviews is in online supplemental appendix 2. The search of PROSPERO identified five ongoing systematic reviews (online supplemental appendix 3).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of two RCTs99 100 was presented in two systematic reviews 39 40. More cutaneous adverse events, including application site burning, were observed with 2 weeks of very potent/potent TCS compared with topical Chinese herbal medicine (RR 12.03, 95% CI 1.59 to 91.26, p=0.02; 11/147 vs 0/148 participants).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Effectiveness and Safety of Herbal Medicine for Atopic Dermatitis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Four reviews [ 7 , 22 , 25 , 27 ] were published in English, and the remaining five [ 21 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 28 ] were published in Chinese. There was a Cochrane review [ 22 ] comparing the efficacy and safety of oral and/or external HM with placebo, no treatment, or active controls. Among the remaining SRs, one [ 21 ] compared oral HM with oral antihistamines; one [ 7 ] compared oral HM with placebo, no treatment, or active controls; one [ 23 ] compared oral HM alone or in combination with CM with CM alone; one [ 24 ] compared oral or external HM in combination with CM with CM alone; one [ 25 ] compared EATM treatments including oral HM, acupuncture, and moxibustion with placebo or CM; one [ 26 ] compared oral Jinpi (meaning tonifying spleen) HM alone or in combination with CM with CM alone; one [ 27 ] compared Tripterygium agents alone or in combination with CM with CM alone; one [ 28 ] compared oral or external HM with CM or placebo.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the AMSTAR-2 checklist, all reviews specified the research question and inclusion criteria including the components of PICO and explained the selection of the study designs for inclusion. However, only two reviews [ 22 , 27 ] preregistered the study protocol. The authors of most SRs [ 21 – 23 , 25 , 27 , 28 ] independently performed the study selection and data extraction.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 54%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…After deduplication, 635 records were screened; 127 records underwent full-text screening and 38 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria (figure 1). 7 8 23–56 The list of excluded reviews is in online supplemental appendix 2. The search of PROSPERO identified five ongoing systematic reviews (online supplemental appendix 3).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of two RCTs99 100 was presented in two systematic reviews 39 40. More cutaneous adverse events, including application site burning, were observed with 2 weeks of very potent/potent TCS compared with topical Chinese herbal medicine (RR 12.03, 95% CI 1.59 to 91.26, p=0.02; 11/147 vs 0/148 participants).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Effectiveness and Safety of Herbal Medicine for Atopic Dermatitis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Four reviews [ 7 , 22 , 25 , 27 ] were published in English, and the remaining five [ 21 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 28 ] were published in Chinese. There was a Cochrane review [ 22 ] comparing the efficacy and safety of oral and/or external HM with placebo, no treatment, or active controls. Among the remaining SRs, one [ 21 ] compared oral HM with oral antihistamines; one [ 7 ] compared oral HM with placebo, no treatment, or active controls; one [ 23 ] compared oral HM alone or in combination with CM with CM alone; one [ 24 ] compared oral or external HM in combination with CM with CM alone; one [ 25 ] compared EATM treatments including oral HM, acupuncture, and moxibustion with placebo or CM; one [ 26 ] compared oral Jinpi (meaning tonifying spleen) HM alone or in combination with CM with CM alone; one [ 27 ] compared Tripterygium agents alone or in combination with CM with CM alone; one [ 28 ] compared oral or external HM with CM or placebo.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the AMSTAR-2 checklist, all reviews specified the research question and inclusion criteria including the components of PICO and explained the selection of the study designs for inclusion. However, only two reviews [ 22 , 27 ] preregistered the study protocol. The authors of most SRs [ 21 – 23 , 25 , 27 , 28 ] independently performed the study selection and data extraction.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%