Child morbidity and mortality associated with alternative policy responses to the economic crisis in Brazil: A nationwide microsimulation study

Abstract

BackgroundSince 2015, a major economic crisis in Brazil has led to increasing poverty and the implementation of long-term fiscal austerity measures that will substantially reduce expenditure on social welfare programmes as a percentage of the country’s GDP over the next 20 years. The Bolsa Família Programme (BFP)—one of the largest conditional cash transfer programmes in the world—and the nationwide primary healthcare strategy (Estratégia Saúde da Família [ESF]) are affected by fiscal austerity, despite being among the policy interventions with the strongest estimated impact on child mortality in the country. We investigated how reduced coverage of the BFP and ESF—compared to an alternative scenario where the level of social protection under these programmes is maintained—may affect the under-five mortality rate (U5MR) and socioeconomic inequalities in child health in the country until 2030, the end date of the Sustainable Development Goals.Methods and findingsWe developed and validated a microsimulation model, creating a synthetic cohort of all 5,507 Brazilian municipalities for the period 2017–2030. This model was based on the longitudinal dataset and effect estimates from a previously published study that evaluated the effects of poverty, the BFP, and the ESF on child health. We forecast the economic crisis and the effect of reductions in BFP and ESF coverage due to current fiscal austerity on the U5MR, and compared this scenario with a scenario where these programmes maintain the levels of social protection by increasing or decreasing with the size of Brazil’s vulnerable populations (policy response scenarios). We used fixed effects multivariate regression models including BFP and ESF coverage and accounting for secular trends, demographic and socioeconomic changes, and programme duration effects. With the maintenance of the levels of social protection provided by the BFP and ESF, in the most likely economic crisis scenario the U5MR is expected to be 8.57% (95% CI: 6.88%–10.24%) lower in 2030 than under fiscal austerity—a cumulative 19,732 (95% CI: 10,207–29,285) averted under-five deaths between 2017 and 2030. U5MRs from diarrhoea, malnutrition, and lower respiratory tract infections are projected to be 39.3% (95% CI: 36.9%–41.8%), 35.8% (95% CI: 31.5%–39.9%), and 8.5% (95% CI: 4.1%–12.0%) lower, respectively, in 2030 under the maintenance of BFP and ESF coverage, with 123,549 fewer under-five hospitalisations from all causes over the study period. Reduced coverage of the BFP and ESF will also disproportionately affect U5MR in the most vulnerable areas, with the U5MR in the poorest quintile of municipalities expected to be 11.0% (95% CI: 8.0%–13.8%) lower in 2030 under the maintenance of BFP and ESF levels of social protection than under fiscal austerity, compared to no difference in the richest quintile. Declines in health inequalities over the last decade will also stop under a fiscal austerity scenario: the U5MR concentration index is expected to remain stable over the period 2017–2030, compared to a 13.3...

Birth size and early pneumonia predict linear growth among HIV‐exposed uninfected infants

“…Targeted interventions to improve household or community sanitation and hygiene have not demonstrated consistent improvement in linear growth (Luby et al, ; Null et al, ). However, evidence from Brazil suggests broad multisectoral interventions to promote access to and use of health care services as well as household financial stability decreased the prevalence of stunting nationwide (Rasella et al, ).…”

“…They (Luby et al, 2018;Null et al, 2018). However, evidence from Brazil suggests broad multisectoral interventions to promote access to and use of health care services as well as household financial stability decreased the prevalence of stunting nationwide (Rasella et al, 2018).…”

Inequity in utilizing health services in the Brazilian Amazon: A population‐based survey, 2015

“…Our data were collected before the austerity measures instituted at the end of 2016 in Brazil, which, among other unpopular measures, reduced expenditure on social welfare programs for 20 years. Current situation may have deteriorated, as shown by simulations estimating a significant increase in cornerstone health indicators, such as child morbidity and mortality …”

“…Major cuts to healthcare costs persist, and the financial crisis will depend on how the government responds . Cash transfer programs and other social investments need to be extended—not reduced—to avoid the reemergence of public health problems, which are worse in socioeconomic and ethnic minorities …”

Por um sistema de saúde sustentável e equânime

“…Triste porque as medidas de austeridade fiscal implantadas pelo governo como resposta à atual crise, que não é apenas econômica, já evidenciam consequências terríveis para as condições de saúde dos brasileiros. Estima-se, por exemplo, que aproximadamente 20 mil mortes e 124 mil hospitalizações de crianças com menos de cinco anos venham a ocorrer até 2030 em decorrência dos cortes orçamentários que atingem a saúde e outras áreas sociais 1 . Mas o momento também é de oportunidade, tendo em vista que novos representantes, com diferentes concepções e propostas para a saúde, serão eleitos este ano para ocupar as diversas posições do executivo (presidente e governadores) e do legislativo (senadores, deputados federais e deputados estaduais), exatamente trinta anos depois da promulgação da Constituição Federal de 1988.…”