2015
DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chicken and porcine models for training in laparoscopy and robotics

Abstract: On account of the natural tissue properties inherent to these porcine and chicken models, they are proving to be instrumental in acquisition of higher surgical skills such as dissection, suturing and use of energy sources, all of which are required in real-time clinical scenarios be it laparoscopy or robotic-assisted procedures. In-vivo training in the animal model continues to be, perhaps, the most sophisticated training method before resorting to real-time surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Rassweiler et al[29] highlighted the importance of preclinical training on pelvic trainer and animal studies before advancing to real-time laparoscopic nephrectomy, there has been an increase in number of training models being utilized and reported in literature in regards to urological procedures. The most common models for training are the porcine or chicken models[30]. Initially, authors studied the learning curve for ablative procedures such as total nephrectomy.…”
Section: Animal and Cadaver Model Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Rassweiler et al[29] highlighted the importance of preclinical training on pelvic trainer and animal studies before advancing to real-time laparoscopic nephrectomy, there has been an increase in number of training models being utilized and reported in literature in regards to urological procedures. The most common models for training are the porcine or chicken models[30]. Initially, authors studied the learning curve for ablative procedures such as total nephrectomy.…”
Section: Animal and Cadaver Model Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 26 studies of adolescent (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) and pediatric surgery (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). Huge variation was noticed in the types of validity sought by researchers and suboptimal incorporation of these tools into curricula was noted across the subgroups of urological surgery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent literature has seen insurgence of several of animate simulators comprising porcine, rabbit and chicken models. On account of the natural tissue properties inherent to these animal models, they are proving to be instrumental in acquisition of higher surgical skills such as dissection, suturing and use of energy sources, all of which are required in real-time clinical scenarios (27). In vivo training in the animal model continues to be the most sophisticated training method before resorting to realtime surgery (27,31).…”
Section: The Role Of Simulation In Urological Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various types of laparoscopic surgery simulators have been described [8,13,14]. There are inanimate models such as box trainers or pelvic trainers, virtual reality simulators, cadaveric models, animal tissue models, and animal models [3,4,[15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there are ethical, legal, and infectious issues with the potential for cross-contamination of surgical instruments, which make human cadavers a less attractive option [3]. Living animal models for training in laparoscopic surgery have been described and the porcine model is the most widely used [4,13]. In pediatric MAS training, the rabbit model seems to be the preferred model since it simulates the anatomical situation more realistic and it allows to perform more different procedures [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%