1996
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(96)00027-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemisorption geometry of NO on Rh(111) by X-ray photoelectron diffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously the p͑2 ϫ 2͒-3NO structure was obtained from high-resolution electron-energy-loss spectroscopy and low-energy electron diffraction data. [39][40][41] It was also determined from DFT calculation by Loffreda et al 7 and more recently by Vang et al 12 According to the experimental data and the first calculations 7 the most stable configuration consists of ͑top+ fcc+ hcp͒ NO with all NO's in the up-right position ͑Fig. 3͒.…”
Section: B P"2 ã 2…-3no and P"3 ã 3…-7nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously the p͑2 ϫ 2͒-3NO structure was obtained from high-resolution electron-energy-loss spectroscopy and low-energy electron diffraction data. [39][40][41] It was also determined from DFT calculation by Loffreda et al 7 and more recently by Vang et al 12 According to the experimental data and the first calculations 7 the most stable configuration consists of ͑top+ fcc+ hcp͒ NO with all NO's in the up-right position ͑Fig. 3͒.…”
Section: B P"2 ã 2…-3no and P"3 ã 3…-7nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for not including the bridge site stems from the observation by means of XPS 16 and EELS 1,17 that NO on Rh͑111͒ occupies only two kinds of sites, which were later identified as top and threefold. 2,18 Probably the bridge sites do not allow for a favorable distribution of adsorbates avoiding lateral interactions, and are therefore not significantly occupied.…”
Section: The Reaction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in the peak intensity and a peak shift to higher frequency were seen as the NO exposure was increased to 4 L, at which point the peak had shifted to 1,606 cm -1 . At exposures above 5 L, the peak intensity gradually decreased with increasing NO exposure; and at 5 L, a new peak appeared at 1,813 cm -1 , and the peak increased in intensity with increasing NO exposure up to 12-16 L. A third peak was observed at 1,495 cm -1 above 16 L. The intensities of the three NO adsorption peaks at 1,495, 1,606, and 1,813 cm -1 became constant above 48 L. From the literature data [16,49], the peaks at 1495, 1606, and 1,813 cm -1 were assigned to NO adsorbed on hcp, fcc, and atop sites, respectively. In the NO adsorption process, the fcc-NO peak shifted continuously from 1,477 to 1,606 cm -1 with increasing NO exposure between 0.2 and 4 L; note that the peak shift is due to a change in the intermolecular interactions that accompany the increased NO coverage.…”
Section: Adsorption and Decomposition Of No On Rh(111)mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For the NO reactivity on the Rh single crystal, the adsorption, dissociation and desorption properties have been extensively examined using various crystal planes such as (111) [11][12][13][14][15][16], (100) [17][18][19][20][21], (110) [22][23][24][25][26], and stepped [19,[27][28][29] surfaces. The adsorbed NO on the Rh surface dissociates completely upon heating at low NO coverage, whereas the dissociation percentage decreases with increasing NO coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%