2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chemical characterization of barks from Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris after fractioning into different particle sizes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
54
2
12

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
17
54
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical differences of the bark fractions are related to the bark's anatomical features, since the grinding behaviour depends on the structural characteristics and the fractions may therefore differ in composition (Vázquez et al 2001;Miranda et al 2012Miranda et al , 2013Baptista et al 2013). In the case of G. glabra, bark has a rather homogeneous structure, with a very small proportion of rhytidome (Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Particle Size On Chemical Composition Of Barkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical differences of the bark fractions are related to the bark's anatomical features, since the grinding behaviour depends on the structural characteristics and the fractions may therefore differ in composition (Vázquez et al 2001;Miranda et al 2012Miranda et al , 2013Baptista et al 2013). In the case of G. glabra, bark has a rather homogeneous structure, with a very small proportion of rhytidome (Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Particle Size On Chemical Composition Of Barkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are necessary to enable low panel density (Miranda et al 2012;Kain et al 2012). To bind these particles, 8-10% UF or tannin resin is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption was higher with smaller particles because of the higher surface area, but the adsorption might also have been favored by the mineral content of smaller particles. Miranda et al (2012Miranda et al ( , 2013 reported that smaller bark particles have higher mineral contents than bigger particles in pine, eucalypt, birch and spruce barks. Gloaguen and Morvan (1997) Scientific names in parentheses indicate probable species; in the corresponding references, the species was not mentioned…”
Section: Critical Evaluation Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%