2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2009.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charged meteoric smoke as ice nuclei in the mesosphere: Part 1—A review of basic concepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dotted line is the same calculation including the dipole interaction as well as the Coulomb interaction between the electron and the positively charged aerosol particles . The requirement for the neutralized particle to continue to growth is that it have the critical radius for condensation (∼0.5 nm) Gumbel and Megner, 2009). Figure 11 shows that positive nuclei can grow to critical size provided that there is a strong bite-out that reduces the electron density to about 100 cm −3 .…”
Section: Positive Charge On the Smallest Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dotted line is the same calculation including the dipole interaction as well as the Coulomb interaction between the electron and the positively charged aerosol particles . The requirement for the neutralized particle to continue to growth is that it have the critical radius for condensation (∼0.5 nm) Gumbel and Megner, 2009). Figure 11 shows that positive nuclei can grow to critical size provided that there is a strong bite-out that reduces the electron density to about 100 cm −3 .…”
Section: Positive Charge On the Smallest Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent modeling of meteoric smoke production and circulation shows that the smoke particles are carried away from the summer pole by circulation (Megner et al, 2006(Megner et al, , 2008Bardeen et al, 2008). Models for condensation require a minimum particle radius near 0.5 nm for typical conditions (Keesee, 1989;Megner et al, 2008;Gumbel and Megner, 2009;Winkler et al, 2008). Circulation models indicate that nanometer-sized meteoric condensation nuclei are likely to have summer densities of order 1 cm −3 which is far too low to account for the charged fraction of nanometer-sized particles observed by rocket-borne probes.…”
Section: Positive Charge On the Smallest Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSPs are thought to participate in the nucleation of waterice clouds in the mesosphere (Rapp and Thomas, 2006;Gumbel and Megner, 2009), and also impact on trace vapours such as H 2 SO 4 and HNO 3 throughout the middle atmosphere (Turco et al, 1981;Prather and Rodriguez, 1988;Mills et al, 2005). After MSPs have been transported down from the mesosphere in the winter polar vortex , they are thought to be assimilated in liquid (supercooled) H 2 SO 4 -H 2 O droplets (typically 40-75 Wt % acid composition, radius >100 nm) in the stratospheric aerosol or Junge layer which is located between 15 and 30 km in altitude (Carslaw et al, 1997;Deshler, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Condensation nuclei are believed to significantly facilitate the formation of NLC particles, e.g. Gumbel and Megner (2009) ;Megner and Gumbel (2009). Because the particle cores are likely to be non-ice, the term "icy particles" instead of "ice particles" is used in the following.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%