2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6455/ab91e2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Charge transfer in positronium–proton collisions: comparison of classical and quantum-mechanical theories

Abstract: Charge transfer in positronium–proton collisions is calculated using the quantum-mechanical convergent close-coupling method and classical trajectory Monte-Carlo method. Previous calculations revealed that at low incident energy the cross section in both theories scales as , where nPs and EPs are the principal quantum number and the center-of-mass energy of the incident positronium atom, respectively. However, the quantum cross section is systematically lower than classical one in absolute magnitude. To invest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[29,30]. The CTMC approach has been applied before in the case of a Ps atom interacting with a proton [18,19,24,31], and recently extended to the laser-assisted case [32]. The theory is described in brief as follows.…”
Section: B Ctmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[29,30]. The CTMC approach has been applied before in the case of a Ps atom interacting with a proton [18,19,24,31], and recently extended to the laser-assisted case [32]. The theory is described in brief as follows.…”
Section: B Ctmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is an urgent need for detailed, benchmarked theoretical data over as wide a range of initial Ps states as possible, and in the low (sub-eV) kinetic-energy range of most interest to experiment. In response to these experimental requirements, we present the results of calculations involving quantum convergent close-coupling (CCC) [17]) and Classical Trajectory Monte Carlo (CTMC) [18,19] techniques. Our work builds upon, and enhances, our previous studies [19][20][21][22][23][24], for reaction 1, as well as for Ps breakup and collisions in-volving Ps state-change: reactions 2 and 3, respectively, as Ps(n Ps , l Ps ) + p → p + e + + e − ,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%