2020
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2019.0309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the Macrophage Response to Immunomodulatory Biomaterials Through Gene Set Analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also examined the extended effect of a single TLR2 neutralizing antibody pre-treatment, administered prior to seeding the macrophages within the various test conditions, to determine if the influence of Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology frontiersin.org transient TLR2-neutralization was maintained at later time points or overwhelmed by pro-inflammatory signaling via non-TLR2-dependent pathways. Teflon ™ AF surfaces preconditioned with 10% FBS was used as a reference for macrophage activation in traditional cell-material interaction models, which frequently use FBS or human serum to recapitulate the in vivo protein adsorption (Amer et al, 2019;Blatt et al, 2020;Buck et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also examined the extended effect of a single TLR2 neutralizing antibody pre-treatment, administered prior to seeding the macrophages within the various test conditions, to determine if the influence of Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology frontiersin.org transient TLR2-neutralization was maintained at later time points or overwhelmed by pro-inflammatory signaling via non-TLR2-dependent pathways. Teflon ™ AF surfaces preconditioned with 10% FBS was used as a reference for macrophage activation in traditional cell-material interaction models, which frequently use FBS or human serum to recapitulate the in vivo protein adsorption (Amer et al, 2019;Blatt et al, 2020;Buck et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies indicate that increased numbers of phenotype markers are needed to capture the increase in complexity of macrophage phenotypes in biomaterial studies. In this regard, gene expression is being pioneered to characterize macrophage phenotypes more thoroughly . In particular, alternatively activated M2 macrophages are important mediators of successful wound healing, and a thorough evaluation of their subtypes in lignin composite wounds would elucidate the mechanisms of their action on promoting wound healing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lignin composites used in our wound-healing studies are in the range of 1–2 kPa of storage modulus (Figure c), thus likely priming macrophage toward anti-inflammatory (M2) phenotypes. Although the markers to identify the inflammatory cell types, particularly those associated with macrophages, work very well for identifying macrophages using in vitro polarization with defined stimuli, there is evidence from the literature that macrophages do not respond to biomaterials in the same way as they do to the biochemical stimuli with distinct polarizations . For example, Graney et al investigated the behavior of macrophages cultured on ceramic-based scaffolds and found hybrid activation states that were not distinctly M1, M2a, or M2c and further noted that some markers were upregulated whereas others were downregulated in their various scaffold studies, which are not possible to distinguish by cell counting from histologic sections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moderate conversion from the M1 to the M2 phenotype can be critical for implant materials fracture healing and osteointegration [ 25 ]. A moderate transition from the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to the immunoregulatory, or anti-inflammatory, M2 phenotype can be an important aspect of the bone healing process promotion, leading to a functional recovery rather than scar tissue formation [ 26 28 ]. In the present study, on the 3rd day, the early stage of inflammation presented mainly M1 macrophages (high proportion), while on the 14th day, the M2 type was dominant (moderate proportion) (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%