2020
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10504588.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing the Ice-Ocean Interface of Icy Worlds: A Theoretical Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface of the ice layer is held at a constant temperature, T s, and the base of the layer is held at a constant melting temperature, T m (for ice: 273 K ‐ see Table 1 for values and sources of all major model parameters). The effects of a mush layer or salt and other solutes at the interface between ice and water (Buffo et al., 2020) are neglected. We assume that the conditions are appropriate for convection to occur within a bottom portion of the solid ice layer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The surface of the ice layer is held at a constant temperature, T s, and the base of the layer is held at a constant melting temperature, T m (for ice: 273 K ‐ see Table 1 for values and sources of all major model parameters). The effects of a mush layer or salt and other solutes at the interface between ice and water (Buffo et al., 2020) are neglected. We assume that the conditions are appropriate for convection to occur within a bottom portion of the solid ice layer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of salts and other dissolved solids in the Europan ocean is not considered despite evidence that Europa's ocean is saline (see Zolotov & Kargel, 2009, for a review). While this may affect the timescale of freezing of the Europan ocean (Buffo et al., 2020), including its effects in our model is left for future work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The later work of Buffo, Meyer, and Parkinson (2021) did not directly impose a percolation threshold, but used a permeability‐porosity relationship derived for sea ice which exhibits significantly reduced permeability at brine volume fractions less than 0.05. Although some authors argue that the existence of a percolation threshold in sea ice prevents desalination for brine volume fractions below the critical porosity (Golden et al., 1998, 2007), others argue that the desalination mechanism transitions from an efficient convection‐dominated process known as gravity drainage to a less efficient diffusion‐dominated process (Buffo, Schmidt, et al., 2021; Buffo et al., 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viscosity is given by μ(T)=μbexp()QTbTRTbT $\mu (T)={\mu }_{b}\mathrm{exp}\left(\frac{Q\left({T}_{b}-T\right)}{R{T}_{b}T}\right)$ where μ b is the melting‐point ( T b ) viscosity, Q is an activation energy, and R is the universal gas constant (Nimmo, 2004). We use an activation energy Q = 40 kJ/mol, leading to viscosity variations of 13 orders of magnitude between T b and 100 K. We neglect mushy layers that might develop during thickening (Buffo et al., 2021). Additional material properties are given in Table S1 in Supporting Information .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%