2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-018-0124-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices

Abstract: A critical question for the field of quantum computing in the near future is whether quantum devices without error correction can perform a well-defined computational task beyond the capabilities of state-of-the-art classical computers, achieving so-called quantum supremacy. We study the task of sampling from the output distributions of (pseudo-)random quantum circuits, a natural task for benchmarking quantum computers. Crucially, sampling this distribution classically requires a direct numerical simulation of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

22
1,221
1
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,014 publications
(1,279 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
22
1,221
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to a universal digital quantum computer, the resources required for experimental boson sampling appear much less demanding. This approach of designing quantum algorithms to demonstrate computational supremacy with nearterm experimental capabilities has inspired a raft of proposals suited to different hardware platforms [18][19][20] .Based on a simple architecture, the boson sampling problem is similarly straightforward to state. A number n of indistinguishable noninteracting bosons (for example, photons) should be injected into n input ports of a circuit comprised of a number m of linearly coupled bosonic modes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to a universal digital quantum computer, the resources required for experimental boson sampling appear much less demanding. This approach of designing quantum algorithms to demonstrate computational supremacy with nearterm experimental capabilities has inspired a raft of proposals suited to different hardware platforms [18][19][20] .Based on a simple architecture, the boson sampling problem is similarly straightforward to state. A number n of indistinguishable noninteracting bosons (for example, photons) should be injected into n input ports of a circuit comprised of a number m of linearly coupled bosonic modes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to a universal digital quantum computer, the resources required for experimental boson sampling appear much less demanding. This approach of designing quantum algorithms to demonstrate computational supremacy with nearterm experimental capabilities has inspired a raft of proposals suited to different hardware platforms [18][19][20] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the simplicity of one-dimensional positionspace tunneling, we find that an asymptotic analysis of QAO spectral gaps for n → ∞, which give bounds on the adiabatic run time, fail to accurately describe the behavior of the tunneling for moderately large n. We find that n > 10 12 is needed to ensure that asymptotic expressions accurately describe behavior, to the point where polynomial and exponential run time scaling can be confused for lower n. Given the current and near-term sizes of quantum computer implementations [18], this failure of asymptotics casts doubt on the efficacy of using asymptotics to analyze the output of these systems or to predict their capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin of Quantum Mechanics is a crucial issue, not only for fundamental Physics but also for several fields of high-technology applications (electronics, computers [113,114], telecommunications [115,116]...). If conventional particles are actually excitations of a preonic vacuum, standard laws like Quantum Mechanics and relativity are expected to be low-energy approximations to a more fundamental (preonic) dynamics.…”
Section: Further Dynamical and Cosmological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%