2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of volcanic geomorphology and geology by slope and topographic openness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though there are several ways to partition DEM landscapes into a variety of terrain types (e.g., Yokoyama et al, 2002;Denizman, 2003;Iwahashi and Pike, 2007;Stepinski and Bagaria, 2009;Patel and Sarkar, 2010;Prima and Yoshida, 2010), the Topographic Position Index seemed effective at locating and quantifying the geomorphology of these recessed features. Somewhat unexpectedly, the LiDAR sensor system flying at an altitude of nearly 1 km was able to record a variety of geomorphologies from these vertical depressions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though there are several ways to partition DEM landscapes into a variety of terrain types (e.g., Yokoyama et al, 2002;Denizman, 2003;Iwahashi and Pike, 2007;Stepinski and Bagaria, 2009;Patel and Sarkar, 2010;Prima and Yoshida, 2010), the Topographic Position Index seemed effective at locating and quantifying the geomorphology of these recessed features. Somewhat unexpectedly, the LiDAR sensor system flying at an altitude of nearly 1 km was able to record a variety of geomorphologies from these vertical depressions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This class is mainly representative of zones with presence of debris-flow lobes, both relict and covered by vegetation (upper picture), as well as corresponding to recent deposits (lower picture). (Yokoyama et al, 2002;Prima and Yoshida, 2010) and local anomalies (Trevisani et al, 2010). The last two indexes are particularly useful for highlighting fine-scale morphologies, such as small channels, structural lineaments and small ridges.…”
Section: Field Surveys and Thematic Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geomorphology of volcanoes has long been used to investigate volcanic development and activity (Thouret, 1999). Digital topography has been used to classify volcano morphology (e.g., Euillades et al, 2013;Favalli et al, 1999;Grosse et al, 2014;Pedersen & Grosse, 2014;Prima & Yoshida, 2010), identify and assess eruptive deposits and structures (e.g., Csatho et al, 2008;Hofton et al, 2006;Hutchison et al, 2015;Zouzias et al, 2011), and evaluate ongoing volcanic hazards (e.g., Favalli et al, 2005;Córdoba et al, 2015;Stefanescu et al, 2012). Many studies have used the morphometry of lava flow deposits (e.g., Nomikou et al, 2014;Pyle & Elliott, 2006;Tarquini et al, 2012;Ventura & Vilardo, 2007), cones (e.g., Fornaciai et al, 2012;Kervyn et al, 2012), and other deposits (e.g., Jessop et al, 2012) to investigate their rheology and dynamics of emplacement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%