Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this result was not affected by our measurement since the readout was completed during each session. Furthermore, we did not apply fading correction factors in all measurements Wesolowska et al (2017) also confirmed that the fading correction of RPLGD was negligible once the readout process was within two weeks after irradiation. Rah et al (2009b) evaluated the fading effect of RPLGD for 19 weeks and reported the number of 1.6%.…”
Section: Fading Effectmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…However, this result was not affected by our measurement since the readout was completed during each session. Furthermore, we did not apply fading correction factors in all measurements Wesolowska et al (2017) also confirmed that the fading correction of RPLGD was negligible once the readout process was within two weeks after irradiation. Rah et al (2009b) evaluated the fading effect of RPLGD for 19 weeks and reported the number of 1.6%.…”
Section: Fading Effectmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This group is currently comprised of six member groups (who provide quality assurance for clinical trials) and three observer QA groups (who provide radiotherapy quality assurance services not focused on clinical trials) [13]. Remote beam output audits are typically conducted using passive luminescent dosimeters that are mailed to an institution [14]. The institution irradiates them to give a known dose under reference/calibration conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IROC uses OSLD ‡ and the IAEA used TLD § but has moved to RPLD's ¶ in the last year or so, the advantages of this transition were shown by Wesolowska et. al [4] . Both IAEA and IROC audits are performed using dosimeters which have high atomic Z value, which is less than ideal in the context of clinical dosimetry.…”
Section: Validated and Peer Reviewedmentioning
confidence: 98%