2018
DOI: 10.1111/tan.13418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: HLA‐DPA1*02:12 differs from HLA‐DPA1*02:07:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution at codon 224 in exon 4.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The "Mismatch in exon" warning was observed for 43 (0.7%) alleles, representing 1.9% of all warnings (43/2324). Following sequence review, 11 of these were considered probably new, of which nine were confirmed by re-typing and were referenced, [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] and two had already been described in the IPD-IMGT/HLA database. The other 32 exon mismatches were not considered new alleles because of homopolymers (15/43), high background (1/43), low read depth (9/43), or phasing anomalies (7/43) ( Table 1).…”
Section: F I G U R E 1 Description Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "Mismatch in exon" warning was observed for 43 (0.7%) alleles, representing 1.9% of all warnings (43/2324). Following sequence review, 11 of these were considered probably new, of which nine were confirmed by re-typing and were referenced, [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] and two had already been described in the IPD-IMGT/HLA database. The other 32 exon mismatches were not considered new alleles because of homopolymers (15/43), high background (1/43), low read depth (9/43), or phasing anomalies (7/43) ( Table 1).…”
Section: F I G U R E 1 Description Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%