2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2013.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the anti-solvent batch, plug flow and MSMPR crystallization of benzoic acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
109
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plug flow crystallizers (PFC) and mixed-suspension mixed-product removal (MSMPR) crystallizers are the two main types of continuous crystallizers. Plug flow can be approximated in tubular crystallizers, which have a narrow residence time distribution and a high surface-to-volume ratio allowing precise process control, while costs are minimized due to small process equipment and straightforward scale-up [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plug flow crystallizers (PFC) and mixed-suspension mixed-product removal (MSMPR) crystallizers are the two main types of continuous crystallizers. Plug flow can be approximated in tubular crystallizers, which have a narrow residence time distribution and a high surface-to-volume ratio allowing precise process control, while costs are minimized due to small process equipment and straightforward scale-up [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,63,64 Thompson et al 39 investigated the effect of structurally related additives on different crystal faces of form I PCM. They found that the growth of the (001) face, and hence the crystal morphology, was affected to different extents by acetanilide and metacetamol additives due to different interactions with the NHCOCH 3 and OH functional groups, respectively. The microscope images (Figure 14a,b) indicate, qualitatively, the effect HPMC additive on growth of PCM crystals in the continuous MSMPR crystallizer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important observation since many recent studies on the subject of continuous crystallization monitoring characterized steady state by relying solely on FBRM 9,18,32,49−51 and/or imaging techniques (for example, low angle light scattering (LALLS) and PVM 19,51 ) or calibrationfree spectroscopy approaches. 9 Arguably, real-time determination of concentration using multivariate models supported by online particle measurements provides a more robust measure of steady-state operation, as opposed to just tracking changes in FBRM statistics or using calibration-free methods. Since these are essentially qualitative measures, they may not reliably determine the attainment of steady-state operation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations