2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2018.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of shapes and volumes of droplets generated in PDMS T-junctions to study nucleation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure applied to the total number of droplets yields a droplet volume distribution, ϕ­( v ), here described by the gamma distribution, , characterized by mean value μ v , variance σ v 2 , and coefficient of variation ψ = σ v /μ v . For the sake of clarity, in Figure B we plot droplet volumes recorded for 30 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This procedure applied to the total number of droplets yields a droplet volume distribution, ϕ­( v ), here described by the gamma distribution, , characterized by mean value μ v , variance σ v 2 , and coefficient of variation ψ = σ v /μ v . For the sake of clarity, in Figure B we plot droplet volumes recorded for 30 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of microfluidic studies of nucleation, this analysis points at the importance of measuring and reporting the droplet volume distribution in detail and in controlling it tightly, so as to minimize its effect on the propagation of experimental uncertainties. It is worth noting that, in our previous study on droplet volume distributions, 9 we had concluded that even a 15% value of the coefficient of variation of the volume distribution would be acceptable for an accurate estimate of the nucleation rate through experiments such as those carried out in this study. That consideration is in principle valid if one considers that the mean value of the success probability is not affected by the coefficient of variation of the volume distribution strongly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[153] The droplet volume can also be precisely controlled, which is essential to the analysis of nucleation kinetics. [154] Measurement of the evolution of the fraction of droplets that contain crystals over time under constant supersaturation therefore yields the nucleation kinetics, [68] as discussed in Section 5.2.1. Analysis of nucleation kinetics has been carried out for a wide range of systems including proteins, [155,156] soluble organics [156,157] and inorganics, [68,70,85,158] poorly-soluble compounds, [159,160] and the solidification of melts, [161,162] and most systems exhibit complex nucleation kinetics due to multiple pathways.…”
Section: Segmented-flow Microfluidic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting that the same general behavior was not only already reported for similar geometries producing double emulsions, [32,53] but also for simple T-junctions operating at much lower capillary numbers. [54,55] This suggests that despite their apparent complexity, at the dripping regime double emulsions follow the same rules of formation as single droplets, as long as the inner droplet is stable inside the envelope of the organic phase. Second, the OA phase flow rate was set to a constant value above the threshold, that is, Q OA = 50 µL min −1 , and the flow rate ratio Q IA /Q PO was varied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%