1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00410.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of root colonization profiles by a microcosm community of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi using 25S rDNA‐targeted nested PCR

Abstract: The aim of the present work was to study colonization patterns in roots by different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi developing from a mixed community in soil. As different fungi cannot be distinguished with certainty in planta on the basis of fungal structures, taxon-discriminating molecular probes were developed. The 5' end of the large ribosomal subunit containing the variable domains D1 and D2 was amplified by PCR from Glomus mosseae (BEG12), G. intraradices (LPA8), Gigaspora rosea (BEG9) and Scutellospora ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
221
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 396 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
221
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…AM are ancient; the first fossil evidence of this symbiosis dates back 400 million years (33). Several authors have proposed that AM have contributed to the colonization of early land plants (32,38).AM are generally assumed to be nonspecific associations, since Glomeromycota are able to colonize roots of several host plants and are themselves colonized by different AM fungal species (12,14,35,44). Despite this lack of host specificity, the diversity of AM fungi has been shown to affect the plant community composition under field conditions (43), and the genetic structure of the AM fungal community was shown to differ significantly according to the plant species…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…AM are ancient; the first fossil evidence of this symbiosis dates back 400 million years (33). Several authors have proposed that AM have contributed to the colonization of early land plants (32,38).AM are generally assumed to be nonspecific associations, since Glomeromycota are able to colonize roots of several host plants and are themselves colonized by different AM fungal species (12,14,35,44). Despite this lack of host specificity, the diversity of AM fungi has been shown to affect the plant community composition under field conditions (43), and the genetic structure of the AM fungal community was shown to differ significantly according to the plant species…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AM are generally assumed to be nonspecific associations, since Glomeromycota are able to colonize roots of several host plants and are themselves colonized by different AM fungal species (12,14,35,44). Despite this lack of host specificity, the diversity of AM fungi has been shown to affect the plant community composition under field conditions (43), and the genetic structure of the AM fungal community was shown to differ significantly according to the plant species (B. Pivato, P. Lemanceau, S. Siblot, G. Berta, C. Mougel, and D. van Tuinen, submitted for publication).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spores were crushed in 40 µl of 1x TE buffer by micropestle and boiled for two minutes. Samples were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for one minute in the presence of 10 µl of 20% Chelex 100 (BioRad) to pellet cell wall fragments and 20 µl of supernatant was transferred to new tubes (Van Tuinen et al 1998). The extracts were subjected to an ethanol precipitation to purify DNA and resuspended in 1x TE buffer for downstream applications.…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, many reports using molecular techniques have been published for the identification of AM fungi colonizing roots. These include taxon-or group-specific PCR (Millner et al 1998;van Tuinen et al 1998), and PCR specific to AM fungi followed by restriction fragmenl length polymorphism (RFLP) (Redecker et al 1997) or by sequencing (Helgason et al 1998). These I To whom correspondence should be addressed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%