2015
DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12298
| View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Responses of bacterial and archaeal communities to the addition of straw during anaerobic digestion of manure at different temperatures (37°C, 44°C and 52°C) were investigated using five laboratory-scale semi-continuous stirred tank reactors. The results revealed that including straw as co-substrate decreased the species richness for bacteria, whereas increasing the operating temperature decreased the species richness for both archaea and bacteria, and also the evenness of the bacteria. Taxonomic classificatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
77
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(154 reference statements)
18
77
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yuan et al (2015) noted that during fermentation of seed sludge under uncontrolled pH conditions, Proteobacteria predominated consisting of 47.3% Bacteria. Chlorofl exi was a predominant phylum in mesophilic digesters (42.58% and 63.47%) treating diffi cult-to-degrade hydrocarbons with both a high (24%) and low (6%) content of solids (Lu et al 2016), while Firmicutes(53%) predominated in co-digesting of various wastes from restaurants, slaughterhouses, manure and households (Sundberg et al 2013, Sun et al 2015. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes communities were very stable during the digestion of the substrates in biogas reactors fed with casein, starch, and cream and only starving periods, changes of pH values, or long-time continuous feeding caused species shifts in bacterial community (Kampmann et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yuan et al (2015) noted that during fermentation of seed sludge under uncontrolled pH conditions, Proteobacteria predominated consisting of 47.3% Bacteria. Chlorofl exi was a predominant phylum in mesophilic digesters (42.58% and 63.47%) treating diffi cult-to-degrade hydrocarbons with both a high (24%) and low (6%) content of solids (Lu et al 2016), while Firmicutes(53%) predominated in co-digesting of various wastes from restaurants, slaughterhouses, manure and households (Sundberg et al 2013, Sun et al 2015. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes communities were very stable during the digestion of the substrates in biogas reactors fed with casein, starch, and cream and only starving periods, changes of pH values, or long-time continuous feeding caused species shifts in bacterial community (Kampmann et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acetoclastic methanogenesis accounting for over 70% methane production in anaerobic digesters [43,44], was considered as the major process in the biogas fermentation, and the dominance of the genus Methanosarcina had been found in various anaerobic digesters [45][46][47]. M. barkeri could utilize acetate, methanol, and H 2 -CO 2 for methane production [44,48], which might enhance the competitive ability of Methanosarcina in anaerobic digesters [45]. Besides the importance of acetoclastic methanogenesis, hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis was also important in R10 and R25 with the abundant presence of Methanobacterium in both the reactors.…”
Section: Different Methanogenesis Between Bovine Rumen and Reactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominance of these two phyla has been characterized in various anaerobic digesters and rumens [45,47,52,53].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Bacterial Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacilli, Clostridia, and Bacteriodia) related to livestock manure used to inoculate the reactors (Pugh, 2013), presumably provided a source of simple OC for SRB (Pruden et al, 2007;Wirth et al, 2012;Sun et al, 2015). In time, the lignin/cellulose ratio of the substrate may have increased as a consequence of bacterial activity because lignin degrades slower than cellulose especially in anaerobic conditions (P erez et al, 2002;Komilis and Ham, 2003;Li et al, 2009).…”
Section: Mechanisms For Sulfate Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%