2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2019.203042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of interfacial shear strength and its effect on ploughing behaviour in single-asperity sliding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metallic oxides usually exhibit a higher interfacial shear strength. [ 47 ] Bowden and Tabor pointed out that while moving two bodies tangentially, the friction force is a function of the real contact area and the junction's shear strength. [ 46,48 ] Depending on the hardness of the body, the contact area and shear strength deviate: the contact of a hard body sliding against a soft body shows a large contact area and low shear strength (copper vs sapphire) while the contact of two hard bodies exhibits a small contact area but large shear strengths (copper oxides vs sapphire).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metallic oxides usually exhibit a higher interfacial shear strength. [ 47 ] Bowden and Tabor pointed out that while moving two bodies tangentially, the friction force is a function of the real contact area and the junction's shear strength. [ 46,48 ] Depending on the hardness of the body, the contact area and shear strength deviate: the contact of a hard body sliding against a soft body shows a large contact area and low shear strength (copper vs sapphire) while the contact of two hard bodies exhibits a small contact area but large shear strengths (copper oxides vs sapphire).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported a change in wear behavior from plowing to wedging (deformed substrate material stacked in front of the sliding asperity and possibly material transfer, Figure 4d,g) with increased shear strength. [ 47,49 ] Hence, oxides with higher shear strength are expected to show less or no plowing. In addition, a soft interfacial medium or film between the two contacting bodies may lead to a small contact area and small shear strengths within the film, ultimately resulting in a low coefficient of friction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) The tool is flat and rigid as the hardness of sapphire is much higher than the sample materials; 2) the coefficient of friction of 0.08 is used between the rough surface and the tool. The coefficient of friction between a mirror finished sapphire surface and GI sample is determined by a linear friction tester [22];…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental set-ups consist of a line contact shear test set-up, a scratch test set-up, an indentation set up and different imaging/microscopy set up all of which will be described in this section. Further details on the experimental characterization procedure and results can be referred to [121] and [107] (appended paper D and E).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first section deals with the individual hardness and elastic modulus of the coating and the substrate and effective hardness and Young's modulus of the coated system. Further details about interfacial shear strength characterization is explained in paper D [121]. The second section deals with the interfacial shear strength of the lubricant boundary layers and oxide layers formed at the interface of the zinc coated and uncoated steel sheets and the pins at various contact pressure and sliding velocities.…”
Section: Experimental Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%