2015
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m115.657171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Inhibitors and Monoclonal Antibodies That Modulate the Interaction between Plasmodium falciparum Adhesin PfRh4 with Its Erythrocyte Receptor Complement Receptor 1

Abstract: Background: PfRh4 binds complement receptor 1 to mediate malaria parasite entry into red blood cells. Results: Monoclonal antibodies and inhibitors either block or enhance PfRh4 interaction with complement receptor 1. Conclusion: Identification was made of critical regions and residues within PfRh4 and CR1 that mediate successful P. falciparum entry. Significance: Understanding functional regions within PfRh4 will aid in design of vaccine subunits.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent insights again come from malaria parasites, with P. falciparum merozoites exploiting CR1 as an entry receptor . It is particularly interesting that the binding of the responsible malaria adhesin PfRh4 to the N‐terminus of CR1 with nanomolar affinity blocks the DAA of CR1 . Whether this functional impairment of DAA is merely a side effect of merozoite adhesion or may actually enhance the invasion pathway through “voluntary opsonization,” a strategy previously reported for other pathogens, remains to be elucidated.…”
Section: Interplay Between Pathogens and Complement Regulatorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent insights again come from malaria parasites, with P. falciparum merozoites exploiting CR1 as an entry receptor . It is particularly interesting that the binding of the responsible malaria adhesin PfRh4 to the N‐terminus of CR1 with nanomolar affinity blocks the DAA of CR1 . Whether this functional impairment of DAA is merely a side effect of merozoite adhesion or may actually enhance the invasion pathway through “voluntary opsonization,” a strategy previously reported for other pathogens, remains to be elucidated.…”
Section: Interplay Between Pathogens and Complement Regulatorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recent insights again come from malaria parasites, with P. falciparum merozoites exploiting CR1 as an entry receptor 142,143. It is particularly interesting that the binding of the responsible malaria adhesin PfRh4 to the N-terminus of CR1 with nanomolar affinity144,145 blocks the DAA of CR1 62. Whether this functional impairment of DAA is merely a side effect of merozoite adhesion or may actually enhance the invasion pathway through "voluntary opsonization," a strategy previously reported for other pathogens, remains to be elucidated.However, taking into account the fact that merozoites recruit FH to impair complement, the concept of voluntary opsonization seems less likely, yet the decoration of merozoites with iC3b may serve to enhance its interaction with erythrocytes by binding to CR1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to its role in rosetting, CR1 has also been identified as a sialic acid-independent invasion receptor for P. falciparum 47 , via the reticulocyte-binding–like homolog 4 (PfRh4) 48 . The binding of PfRh4 has been mapped to site 1 in LHR-A 49 51 . Immuno-fluorescent staining of freshly released invasive merozoites showed CR1 on erythrocytes to be more intense around the merozoite, referred to by the authors as “capping,” suggesting CR1 clustering may have a role in invasion 47 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parts of PfRH1 have been shown to be carried into the invaded RBC while some is shed into media upon invasion . Importantly, antibodies targeting RH1, RH2a, RH4 and RH5 have been shown to block merozoite invasion Douglas et al, 2011Douglas et al, , 2014Gunalan et al, 2011Gunalan et al, , 2013Gao et al, 2013;Lim et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%