2018
DOI: 10.1109/jphot.2018.2866628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Evanescent Field Gas Sensor Structures Based on Silicon Photonics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that Ranacher et al [24,25] measured a Γ consistently higher than the simulated one. This might be caused by the absorption and subsequent release of CO 2 by the plastic tubing and chip case used in the experiments.…”
supporting
confidence: 38%
“…We note that Ranacher et al [24,25] measured a Γ consistently higher than the simulated one. This might be caused by the absorption and subsequent release of CO 2 by the plastic tubing and chip case used in the experiments.…”
supporting
confidence: 38%
“…Our approach is to use SiO2 and Si3N4 as materials for the lower cladding region of the waveguide. Recently we experimentally demonstrated silicon strip waveguides for CO2 sensing using two different platforms, i.e., silicon strip waveguides on a Si3N4 membrane [4] and on a solid (Si3N4)/SiO2 substructure [5]. In order to further improve the sensing performance of the waveguide structure, we aim to develop Si slot waveguides on SiO2 with a significantly higher evanescent field ratio compared to the strip waveguides that were used in our previous work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noise-equivalent power (NEP) is obtained by measuring the noise level at 1 Hz bandwidth for our detection scheme with a sourcemeter (Keithley SMU 2450). Power levels for the VERD are higher since the light is irradiated by free-space rather than through a (slightly) absorptive waveguide [10]. Using an integrated detection scheme the NEP is expected to further improve for all detectors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%