1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0030-4018(96)00636-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a photorefractive rhodium doped barium titanate at 1.06 μm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We attribute most of the extra reduction of G to experimental problems: the control of the overlap of the beams inside the crystal imposed a large-diameter pump beam (2.5 mm), which favors the oscillation of spurious beams as observed in the cw regime. 1 To summarize, we have demonstrated high (G 14.2 cm 21 ) two-wave mixing gain at 1.06 mm in the nanosecond regime in photorefractive BaTiO 3 :Rh. We observed that the required averaged density of energy was roughly the same as in the cw regime.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We attribute most of the extra reduction of G to experimental problems: the control of the overlap of the beams inside the crystal imposed a large-diameter pump beam (2.5 mm), which favors the oscillation of spurious beams as observed in the cw regime. 1 To summarize, we have demonstrated high (G 14.2 cm 21 ) two-wave mixing gain at 1.06 mm in the nanosecond regime in photorefractive BaTiO 3 :Rh. We observed that the required averaged density of energy was roughly the same as in the cw regime.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The attenuation configuration diminishes the oscillation of spurious beams in the crystal, which has been shown, in the cw regime, to compete with the desired photorefractive grating. 1 The experiments were conducted with extraordinary polarizations for energies ranging from 10 to 200 mJ͞pulse incident upon the sample, corresponding to average illuminations per pulse of 1-20 MW cm 22 . The experimental data for G versus illuminations are plotted in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From that, we can derive the value of N e f f being (0.9 ± 0.2) × 10 17 cm −3 . This 'experimental' value of N e f f will now be compared to the one deduced from the data in table 1, as based on a compact expression for N e f f , derived, e.g., by Huot et al [8] for the three-valence model:…”
Section: Comparison With Photorefractive Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the appendix we give the detailed expression for η(I ) as specified for the three-valence model by Huot et al [8]. It is seen there that η(I ) does not depend on k g .…”
Section: Comparison With Photorefractive Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation