2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.11.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and optimization of Abrasive Water Jet Machining parameters of aluminium/tungsten carbide composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As these two parameters vary, most of the dispersion of results occurs, as shown in the slope of the graphs relating these parameters. It should be noted that the influence of WP and TFR on T formation is in good agreement with what has been previously determined by different authors in various materials [16][17][18]. The AMFR parameter has a minor influence compared to the other parameters.…”
Section: Taper Analysissupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As these two parameters vary, most of the dispersion of results occurs, as shown in the slope of the graphs relating these parameters. It should be noted that the influence of WP and TFR on T formation is in good agreement with what has been previously determined by different authors in various materials [16][17][18]. The AMFR parameter has a minor influence compared to the other parameters.…”
Section: Taper Analysissupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The AMFR analysis reflects that the importance of this parameter is higher in this area than in the previous ones, reaching an F-value of 0.81 compared to 0.24 and 0.21 previously. This change of trend is in good agreement with what was found in [16,17] and is mainly due to the loss of penetration capacity of the jet as the material thickness increases, favoring the formation of RCR. Figure 14 shows the contour graph for the variable T as a function of the variables that show significance.…”
Section: Anovasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, the AWJM process shows its own limitations that lead to the appearance of specific defects during the cutting process (Figure 1). The most common defects in the process are the kerf taper, the Erosion Affected Zone (EAZ) and the formation of three possible different roughness zones along the machined surface [22]: Initial Damage Region (IDR). The area where the water jet hits on the material producing EAZ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second factor was percentage of the reinforcement, and the least affecting was STD. The SR greatly influenced by the amount of the tungsten carbide inclusion [21]. Gnanavelbabu et al machined hybrid aluminium composites (AA6061-B 4 C-hBN) using AWJM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%