2009
DOI: 10.1603/022.038.0415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and Identification of Proteolytic Bacteria From the Gut of the Velvetbean Caterpillar (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
45
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Diverse digestive enzymes have been identified from our annotation results. Studies on other lepidopterans also support that the isolated gut bacteria were able to hydrolyse starch, cellulose, pectin and protein …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Diverse digestive enzymes have been identified from our annotation results. Studies on other lepidopterans also support that the isolated gut bacteria were able to hydrolyse starch, cellulose, pectin and protein …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In contrast to the results presented in the current study, Mika et al [20] did not isolate microorganisms with peptidase activity, but used an extract of the insects (e.g., Rhizoperta domenica; lesser grain borer). In the study of Visôtto et al [21], proteolytic microorganisms (substrate: casein) from the gut of the velvetbean caterpillar (Anticarsia gemmatalis) were screened. An optimization of the medium for B. subtilis 214 was performed to increase the extracellular peptidase activity (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the precise mode of cleavage has not been described, VBC larvae may produce a specific gut carboxypeptidase that is capable of cleaving the C-terminal Ala from the largely cyclic Vu-In. Thus far, trypsin-like proteases have been predominantly described; however, the gut tissues of A. gemmatalis larvae also harbor bacteria potentially capable of further proteolysis Visôtto et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%