Characteristics of innovation orientations in construction companies

Abstract

Purpose An organisation’s performance tends to be associated with its innovativeness. However, innovation remains challenging in the construction industry, partially due to the complex nature of this industry. Nevertheless, innovation orientations (i.e. creation and adoption) shed new light on innovation in the construction industry. These orientations are similar but not entirely identical. Although most studies do not discuss these orientations in any detail, this study aims to classify the characteristics of the innovation orientations and determines the state of innovation among construction companies in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach A survey questionnaire was mailed to 1,230 construction companies in Malaysia. Descriptive analysis was used to examine the respondents’ profiles, and factor analysis was used to classify the innovation orientation characteristics. A paired samples t-test was used to determine the state of innovation among the construction companies. Findings Innovation creation reflects a pioneer’s efforts and involves being a market explorer that tolerates risk and is research and development (R&D)-oriented, whereas innovation adoption involves being a creative imitator, a market follower and a safe player. Construction companies in Malaysia are innovation adoption–oriented. Research limitations/implications This study uses quantitative methods only; therefore, the findings are statistically oriented. The small sample size makes generalisation challenging, so this study reflects only the built environment of the developing country of Malaysia. Originality/value This study classifies the characteristics of innovation creation and innovation adoption with respect to the innovation orientation of construction companies in Malaysia.

Examining transition pathways to construction innovation in Russia: a system dynamics approach

“…Nevertheless, a high level of innovation performance is extremely important for the industry's growth and the development a country economy. Many studies have been undertaken to examine innovationrelated topics in the field of construction management (Egbu 2004;Stewart 2007;Panuwatwanich et al 2008Panuwatwanich et al , 2009aPanuwatwanich et al , 2009bDavidson 2013;Ozorhon 2013;Davis et al 2016;Dansoh et al 2017;Yusof et al 2017). It is worth noting, that most of the aforementioned studies have addressed innovation processes in the industry by mainly focusing at the project and firm level.…”

“…Based on the existing construction management literature (Seaden and Manseau 2001;Panuwatwanich et al 2009a;Van Egmond 2012;Xue et al 2014;Orstavik et al 2015;Yusof et al 2017) and previously conducted studies (Suprun and Stewart 2015;Suprun et al 2016), we have identified three main factors that influence or force decision-makers within construction companies to acknowledge innovation implementation as a priority to improve efficiency and effectiveness:…”

“…Undoubtedly, a number of systematically targeted strategies and rational policies are required in order to achieve the set of government goals and shape successful transition of the construction sector in the innovative future. Hence, it was chosen to set the model time bound at 30 years to explicitly capture the long-term impact of various government policies on construction innovation performance.Taking into account the emerged dynamic hypotheses, the model distinguishes between two types of innovative companies: imitators and innovators(Orstavik et al 2015;Yusof et al 2017).Imitators represent construction firms that introduce and implement technological innovations by adopting ideas from others and slightly improving construction materials, techniques, technologically advanced production methods, products and services. Such firms mainly implement innovations known as incremental, i.e.…”

Drivers of Innovation Using BIM in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Firms

“…There is a growing literature on the adoption and implementation of BIM and the established literature on innovation by developing the notion of contexts integrated in the innovation process. The performance of an organization tends to be associated with its capacity for innovation, being it a challenge in the construction industry, partly due to the complex nature of this industry (Yusof et al 2017).…”

Identifying factors for incorporating spatial data into BIM using the Delphi method

“…As with the adoption of any innovation or new technology, previous studies have established that construction firms face a host of difficulties due to limitations such as the unique social, economic and technological contexts of developing countries (Bui et al, 2016). Adoption of new technology or processes remains challenging in the construction industry (Nor'Aini Yusof, 2017), which is known to be lagging behind in adopting new ideas, technologies and processes. Therefore, it would not be surprising if BIM technology received a slow response from the industry players (Rogers et al, 2015, Liao et al, 2017.…”