2004
DOI: 10.1080/14942119.2004.10702498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and Significance of a Harvester Operators’ Working Technique in Thinnings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
77
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the same machine is operated by another operator, results may differ. Differences could be explained by human factors (driver's motoric skills, work planning and decision-making process) during the operation (Ovaskainen et al 2004). Purfürst (2009) concluded that under favorable conditions and in easy terrain the effect of the operator on the overall performance amounts to 37%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the same machine is operated by another operator, results may differ. Differences could be explained by human factors (driver's motoric skills, work planning and decision-making process) during the operation (Ovaskainen et al 2004). Purfürst (2009) concluded that under favorable conditions and in easy terrain the effect of the operator on the overall performance amounts to 37%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this had been considered in the model, TMRW Sel and TMFF Sel,Corr would have had a somewhat poorer performance, relative to both TSRW Sel , 2m2FF Corr and CFF Corr (Table III). In real-life forest operations, the operator often handles obstructing trees by reversing the machine along the strip road to gain access to a certain tree (Ovaskainen et al, 2004;Lindroos et al, 2008). In our model, the algorithms presented in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bergström et al, 2007;Iwarsson Wide & Belbo, 2009) and harvester and forwarder working patterns (e.g. Gullberg, 1997;Ovaskainen et al, 2004;Ovaskainen et al, 2006;Ovaskainen, 2008). Functions describing new machine systems with boom-tip mounted, area-based felling devices and new working techniques were also implemented.…”
Section: Approach and Scenario Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29,31]). Numerous earlier forest work studies have been carried out to analyze the effect of the harvester operator on performance, and many studies have emphasized that there is a significant correlation between the work experience and skills of an operator and his/her productivity in forest machine work (e.g., [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75]). For instance, Purfürst and Erler [74] have found out that together, the stem volume and the operator explain 84% of the total overall variation in cutting productivity, and the operator alone explains 37% of the variance.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Datasets and Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, on the basis of the results of this study, it can be concluded that a big leap has not necessarily been taken in the development of forest machine technology during the last ten years. Nevertheless, when comparing the results of different forest work studies, attention must be paid to the effect of the operator and his/her skills on his/her work performance in cutting operations [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75]. As the influence of the harvester operator on the cutting productivity in windthrown areas is significant [29,31], it is very important that the skills of operators are superior for the purpose of cutting windfalls safety and effectively.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%