2007
DOI: 10.1017/s003329170700027x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and functions of non-suicidal self-injury in a community sample of adolescents

Abstract: Community adolescents reported high rates of NSSI, engaged in to influence behaviors of others and to manage internal emotions. Intervention efforts should be tailored to reducing individual issues that contribute to NSSI and building alternative skills for positive coping, communication, stress management, and strong social support.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

64
632
9
45

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 719 publications
(770 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
64
632
9
45
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of our self-injurig adolescents were selfmutilators. The finding and other results are in accordance with the findings of related literature in many aspects: the age range of the patients [12], the preferred body regions being the arms/elbow/hands/ legs/chest, which is similar to data drawn from a community sample of adolescents [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of our self-injurig adolescents were selfmutilators. The finding and other results are in accordance with the findings of related literature in many aspects: the age range of the patients [12], the preferred body regions being the arms/elbow/hands/ legs/chest, which is similar to data drawn from a community sample of adolescents [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Non-suicidal self-injury, the term recently coined by Lloyd-Richardson as a contrast to its counterpart suicidal self-injury (SSI) seems to eradicate the previous terminological confusion [27]. In accordance with this recent viewpoint, the specific terms self-injury, suicidal and non-suicidal self-injury and their acronyms (SI, SSI, NSSI) are used in this study and both the former terminological formulations (parasuicide, self-mutilation, self-carving, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As outlined in the top left corner of Figure 2, this creates the four functions of automatic negative reinforcement (i.e., removal or distraction from aversive thoughts or feelings), automatic positive reinforcement (i.e., feeling generation), social positive reinforcement (i.e., obtaining a favorable social response), and social negative reinforcement (i.e., removal or distraction from external events). The structural validity, internal consistency reliability, and construct validity of the FFM have been supported in our earlier work (Nock & Prinstein, 2004, 2005 and the model has received independent support from other research groups (e.g., Hilt, Cha, & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2008;Lloyd-Richardson, Perrine, Dierker, & Kelley, 2007).…”
Section: Elaboration On the Social Functions Of Nssimentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Moreover, our inclusion criteria focused on NSSI in general, rather than a particular form of NSSI. As a result, the methods of NSSI observed in this study frequently included minor forms of NSSI, such as self-scratching and biting (Lloyd-Richardson, Perrine, Dierker, & Kelley, 2007). Given that the interpersonal sequelae of NSSI may differ depending on the method of NSSI (e.g., cutting may elicit more intense responses from other, relative to minor NSSI), future research examining NSSI method as a moderator of the relations between NSSI and interpersonal support and conflict is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%